The Abongo Abroad: Military-Sponsored Travel in Ghana, the United States, and the World, 1959–1992 by John V. Clune
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Abongo Abroad: Military-Sponsored Travel in Ghana, the United States, and the World, 1959–1992 by John V. Clune Christian Ruth (bio) The Abongo Abroad: Military-Sponsored Travel in Ghana, the United States, and the World, 1959–1992. By John V. Clune. (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2017. Pp. x, 268. $55.00 paper; $9.99 ebook) John V. Clune's new book, The Abongo Abroad, explores the stories of Ghanaian military personnel who took part in transnational military travel during the twentieth century. Clune is part of an advancing wave of foreign relations scholars who are taking a long view of development and modernization theory during the Cold War. The [End Page 137] Abongo Abroad shows how military sponsored travel, particularly the International Military Education and Training Program (IMET), was a way to modernize and internationalize generations of Third-World soldiers. These men would gain relevant knowledge and experience in the United States and other nations, and would then go back to their home countries and create Western style political and economic institutions. Clune's book is split into four chapters. The first provides a basic overview of modernization and development theory and its pervasiveness in U.S. foreign policy during the early 1950s through the end of the Vietnam War. In the post-Vietnam era, modernization theory declined heavily in favor of cheaper, more easily managed foreign policy paradigms, but Clune's unique argument is that military travel in the form of IMET was a special holdover from otherwise disappearing modernizing programs. The second chapter shows the surprisingly international development of military education in Ghana, which created its various military branches with British and Canadian expertise. There was an important separation, Clune shows, between the experiences of the Ghanaian soldiers who went through training at home and abroad and the soldiers of other nations who came to Ghana. Ghana itself adopted a Pan-Africanist outlook, hosting and training soldiers from African nations even as they sent their own troops to the United States. The third and fourth chapters provide greater detail into the lives of many Ghanaian troops and the IMET program itself. Rather than learning Western systems and transporting them back to Ghana, soldiers used their travel for their own benefit, buying commodities and land for their families back home or taking advantage of the travel to avoid political oppression and to escape the Cold War systems they were stuck in. The IMET program received increasing criticism due to its ineffectiveness at promoting Western modernization reforms, since few of its intended lessons truly took hold, but it survived by being relatively cheap and by providing a strong point of contact for US-Ghanaian diplomacy. [End Page 138] Clune's theoretical framework is a fresh departure from established studies of modernization theory that focus on large-scale economic development. Clune is at his strongest when discussing the intersection between African military systems and the diffuse nature of modernizing ideology. He successfully joins a growing field of scholarship on African studies that steps beyond the immediate post-colonial moments of the 1950s and 1960s, and persuasively argues for a longer view of modernization theory using military travel. Somewhat disappointing, however, is the lack of depth regarding the greater African context for the book, which does not provide enough detail about the Ghanaian, or even African, story of decolonization and militarism. Due to the chaotic archival system that many post-colonial administrations had, finding rich primary sources can be problematic. Clune's sources focus mostly on a few select memoirs to describe the IMET program in detail, alongside an admittedly impressive variety of U.S. based archival material, and there is a serious lack of Ghanaian archives present. These problems are perhaps unavoidable given the topics being discussed. While it would be easy to press Clune for more information and a more diverse source base, it would be unrealistic to seriously expect it. The Abongo Abroad, despite that most obvious flaw, is an excellent intervention into the literature of both African military history and U.S. foreign relations. Christian Ruth CHRISTIAN RUTH is a PhD student at the University at Albany, SUNY. His research focuses on the intersection...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».