Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Childhood obesity has become a concern in most economically developing countries.The reasons for this seem clear: too much food and not enough movement.This dilemma has received much scientific attention, and the question arises: How do we get children to move and make good eating choices?In their opinion piece in this issue of the Journal of Sport and Health Science (JSHS), Ring-Dimitriou et al. 1 make an argument that playing structured and supervised traditional sports will help children with obesity, where traditional sports include football, handball, gymnastics, athletics, and martial arts.Khan et al., 2 in a widely cited The Lancet paper, argue what seems obvious: that sport and physical activity may contribute to the overall health of nations.In a previous issue of JSHS, Castagna et al. 3 make an appeal to the value of team sports, reminding us how much fun it was to play soccer, basketball, handball, and rugby when we were children.JSHS has even devoted a special topic of traditional sports and their impact on physical well-being.4À9 However, questions remain.For example, why, during the time we were growing up (in my case >50 years ago), were there so few children with obesity?Why were sport and exercise and games so much fun then, and why did they occupy so much of our spare time?Why, for many of today's children, does moving and playing team sports and running around in parks and forests seem such a chore?Of course, the world today is different from what it was 50 years ago, and children grow up in different circumstances now compared with then.But what are the conceptual differences between now and then?What did I have as a 5-or 8-or 12-year-old boy that children now typically do not have anymore?There are several answers.Opportunity-When I stepped outside my home, I had access to a hilly grass field, a playground, a park, a huge forest, and a soccer and team handball field within minutes of walking.In the winter, the grassy hill became my downhill skiing slope, the handball field my skating rink.During summer vacation, when we were allowed to stay out until dark, the street became a volleyball court, a soccer pitch, or a place to play hide and seek with kids ranging from 3 to 15, boys and girls.Everybody was outside; being inside was boring, and parents did not want their children inside, definitely not on a warm, sunny, summer afternoon or early evening.The playground started right outside the house.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,026 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,015 | 0,020 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,060 | 0,049 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».