MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2937090388 · doi:10.1182/blood.v130.suppl_1.123.123

Single Cell Resolution Profiling Defines the Innate and Adaptive Immune Repertoires Modulated By Daratumumab and IMiDs Treatment in Multiple Myeloma (MM)

2017· article· en· W2937090388 sur OpenAlexaff
Paola Neri, Ranjan Maity, Inès Tagoug, Peter Duggan, Sylvia McCulloch, Víctor H. Jiménez‐Zepeda, Jason Tay, Lawrence Boise, Anjan Thakurta, Nizar J. Bahlis

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensInstitute of Cancer ResearchUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDaratumumabAntibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicityImmunologyBiologyCD38Bone marrowImmune systemCytotoxic T cellCancer researchMultiple myelomaAntibodyMonoclonal antibodyCD34Cell biologyStem cell

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The combination of immunomodulatory (IMiDs) drugs with monoclonal antibodies targeting the transmembrane glycoprotein CD38 induces deep and durable responses in MM patients. IMiDs mediated degradation of the transcription factors IKZF1/3 attenuates myeloma cells proliferation and releases IKZF1 transcriptional repression of IL-2 and type I/II interferon response genes promoting T, NK and NKT cells proliferation and activation. Similarly targeting the non-lineage restricted molecule CD38 with daratumumab also exerts direct and indirect tumoricidal effects. Mechanisms implicated in daratumumab-mediated killing include a direct apoptotic effect and activation of cytotoxic immune effector functions, including antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, and complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). Therefore, the synergistic effects observed with daratumumab and IMiDs are postulated to derive from their co-modulation of the host adaptive and innate immunity. A systematic unsupervised interrogation of the bone marrow immune cells of daratumumab and IMiDs treated MM patients is key for the prediction of their clinical responses and the understanding of underlying mechanisms of resistance. Methods and Results: Bone marrow (BM) aspirates and matching peripheral blood were collected from 20 myeloma patients treated with daratumumab in combination with IMiDs (lenalidomide or pomalidomide) prior to initiation of therapy and at the time of disease response (n=10) or progression (n=10). Bone marrow mononuclear cells were isolated through Ficoll density gradients coupled with magnetic sorting of CD138pos and CD138neg cells. Unbiased mRNA profiling of BM CD138neg cells was performed by single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) using the GemCode system (10x Genomics), a droplet-based method enabling high cell throughput and efficient single-cell capture. Sequencing was performed on Illumina NEXTseq platform in a paired-end format. Cell Ranger Single Cell Software Suite was used to perform sample de-multiplexing, barcode processing, and single-cell 3′ gene counting. Sequencing data from 30,074 CD138neg single cells (12,908 cells from responding (S) and 17,166 cells from progressing (R) patients) were kept for analysis by the Seurat R package and analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA) and clusteringand then visualized by t -distributed stochastic neighbour embedding (t -SNE) projection. Shown in Fig 1 a representative t -SNE and heatmap plot of 9 immune clusters typically identified in individual samples including terminal effector T cells (KLRG1hi, IL7Rlow), memory T cells (central memory TCM: SELLhi CCR7hi and effector memory TEM: SELLlow CCR7low), CD4 T cells, NK and NKT cells (NKG7, GNLY), B cells (MS4A1), monocytes (CD14, LYZ), macrophages (CD68) and dendritic cells (FCER1A, CST3). Transcriptome profiling of immune cells pre- and post-treatments in S and R patients revealed the following key findings: 1) T cells (CD8Apos and CD3pos) were largely senescent in myeloma patients lacking CD28 expression; 2) amongst checkpoint inhibitory genes LAG3 had the highest expression on activated T cells followed by PDCD1 and to a much lesser extent by HAVCR2 and TIGIT; 3) exposure to daratumumab and IMiDs resulted in the expansion of activated effector CD8 cyctotoxic and effector memory T cells and depletion of CD38pos T and B cells; 4) compared to resistant or progressing patients, responders were characterized by higher CD28 expression in T cells, a significantly larger clusters of central memory T cells (TCM: IL7Rpos, SELLpos, CCR7pos, CD27pos, KLRG1neg) and a M1 activated macrophage signature (IL1Bpos, CCL3pos). Of note no significant difference was noted in CD38 transcript amongst S and R patients. Single cell profiling of CD138pos cells will be updated at the meeting as well as further characterization of the immune repertoire and TCR clonality status of R and S patients. Conclusion: Anunbiased single cell profiling of bone marrow immune cells in MM patients exposed to Daratumumab and IMiDs demonstrated that LAG3 targeting and restoration of co-stimulatory genes expression (CD28) should be studied as means to reverse immunoparesis. Central memory T cells (TCM) expansion and M1 macrophage signature in responders to Daratumumab and IMiDs combinations represent potential biomarkers of response. Download : Download high-res image (119KB) Download : Download full-size image Figure 1 . Disclosures Neri: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Jimenez-Zepeda: Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Boise: Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy. Thakurta: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bahlis: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,002

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations16
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207