T132. PATIENT AND PHYSICIAN FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH FIRST DIAGNOSIS OF PSYCHOTIC DISORDER IN PRIMARY CARE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The family physician has been identified as a key player on the pathway to care in first-episode psychosis, as the majority of young people with early psychosis make help-seeking contacts in primary care. This involvement of family physicians has been shown to reduce the likelihood of negative pathways to care. As such, increasing the involvement of family physicians in the identification of early psychosis would be beneficial for improving service-related outcomes. Our objectives were to estimate the proportion of youth with early psychosis who are diagnosed in primary care, and to identify patient- and physician-level factors associated with a first diagnosis of psychosis in primary care. Using population-based health administrative data, we constructed a retrospective cohort of people aged 14 to 35 years with a first diagnosis of psychosis in Ontario between 2005 and 2015. We extracted data on all mental health help-seeking attempts in primary care in the six-month period preceding the first diagnosis of psychotic disorder. Restricting the sample to people with help seeking attempts in primary care, we used multilevel logistic regression models, with physician as the clustering unit, to model the patient and physician characteristics associated with first diagnosis in primary care. Nearly two thirds (63%) of young people with early psychosis (n = 39,449) had mental health help-seeking contacts in primary care in the six-month period prior to first diagnosis. Of those, 47% were diagnosed in primary care (30% of total cohort), whereas 53% received their diagnosis in secondary or tertiary care services (33% of total cohort). Initial results suggest that people who are older at psychosis onset are more likely to receive their first diagnosis in primary care, and people who have a history of other psychosocial comorbidities are less likely to be diagnosed in primary care. Full results for patient- and physician-level factors associated with a first diagnosis in primary care will be presented. Approximately one in three young people with early psychosis in Ontario receive their first diagnosis of psychotic disorder from a family physician, and an additional third of people with early psychosis made help-seeking attempts in primary care for mental health reasons but received their first diagnosis in secondary or tertiary care services. The findings from these analyses will allow us to identify subgroups of primary care providers to target with continuing medical education efforts to better support family physicians in their central role in pathways to care for first-episode psychosis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».