161 Evaluation of intra-articular CNTX-4975 (highly purified, synthetic trans-capsaicin) for knee OA pain in patients with radiographic presence of OA in the opposite knee
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: This TRIUMPH study post-hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of CNTX-4975 in subjects with unilateral knee pain with/without radiographic evidence of OA in the opposite knee. Methods: Subjects aged 45-80 years with chronic knee OA and stable moderate to severe knee OA pain in one knee (index knee; non-index knee, no to mild pain) who failed oral/intra-articular therapies were randomized 2:1:2 to a single intra-articular injection of placebo, CNTX-4975 0.5 mg, or CNTX-4975 1.0 mg. Randomization was stratified by Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade (2-3 vs 4) and body mass index (<30 vs ⩾ 30 kg/m2). Unilateral OA was defined as K-L grade 0, 1, or missing in the non-index (untreated) knee; bilateral OA, grades 2-4 in both knees. Area under the curve was assessed for change from baseline in WOMAC QA1, pain with walking on a flat surface, daily through week 12 and weekly through week 24. Weekly WOMAC B and C scores were also analysed. Statistical tests were 2-sided (alpha, 0.10). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: Safety analysis comprised 175 subjects; unilateral knee OA, n = 52 (placebo, n = 17; CNTX-4975: 0.5 mg, n = 18; 1.0 mg, n = 17) and bilateral knee OA, n = 123 (placebo, n = 53; 0.5 mg, n = 16; 1.0 mg, n = 54). Efficacy analysis included 172 subjects (3 in bilateral group excluded before unblinding). Mean baseline WOMAC QA1 pain score (index knee) was 7.3 (numeric rating scale, 0-10) in the unilateral and bilateral groups. WOMAC QA1 scores improved with CNTX-4975 1.0 mg vs placebo in the unilateral (week 12, P=0.0004; week 24, P=0.0017) and bilateral groups (week 12, P=0.0053; week 24, P=0.0170); other results shown in the Table. Incidence of TEAEs was similar between unilateral and bilateral groups through week 24 (35% vs 33%). TEAEs were mild to moderate; most were determined unrelated to study treatment. Mean Changes From Baseline in Average Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis AUC, area under the curve; LSMD, least squares mean difference; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. AUC using analysis of covariance in modified intent-to-treat population. Week 12 data for WOMAC QA1 are daily values; all other data are weekly averages. WOMAC 11-point numeric rating scale: 0 (none) to 10 (extreme); WOMAC B dimension score is the sum of the 2 stiffness subscale responses (range, 0 to 20); WOMAC C dimension score is the sum of the 17 function subscale responses (range, 0 to 170). Conclusion: CNTX-4975 1.0 mg significantly improved pain with walking and subject-reported knee stiffness and physical function vs placebo in the index knee and was well tolerated. Greater absolute improvements were seen in subjects with unilateral vs bilateral knee OA, although the non-index knee had no to mild pain at baseline. Disclosures: R. Stevens: Corporate appointments; Employee of Centrexion Therapeutics Corp. J. Campbell: Corporate appointments; Employee of Centrexion Therapeutics Corp. K. Guedes: Corporate appointments; Employee of Centrexion Therapeutics Corp. V. Smith: Corporate appointments; Employee of Premier Research. P. Hanson: Corporate appointments; Employee of Centrexion Therapeutics Corp.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».