38.3 ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN INVOLUNTARY ADMISSION AND CLINICAL PRESENTATION AT FIRST HOSPITALIZATION AFTER PSYCHOSIS ONSET AMONG FIRST-GENERATION MIGRANT GROUPS IN CANADA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Some ethnic minority groups have an increased risk of developing a psychotic disorder, and often face complex and aversive pathways to care. However, Canadian data on this trend is lacking, particularly regarding involuntary admission. It is also less clear whether some of these trends may be driven by ethnic differences in clinical presentation or its perception by service providers. Our objective was to assess whether there were differences across first-generation ethnic minority groups in hospitalization and involuntary admission after psychosis onset, and whether the groups differed in symptom and behavior profiles at first admission. Using population-based health administrative data, we constructed a retrospective cohort of first-onset cases of psychotic disorder in Ontario between 2009 and 2014. This cohort was linked to data from Immigration, Citizenship, and Refugee Canada for information on migrant status and country of origin. We followed the cohort for a two-year period after first diagnosis to ascertain the first psychiatric hospitalization event and compared the risk of having involuntary status for first-generation ethnic minority groups relative to a general population reference group. We also examined differences in symptoms, behaviour, and level of functioning across groups. Of the 6204 psychiatric hospitalizations in our study cohort, 18.9% (n=1172) were attributed to first-generation migrants. Nearly all migrant groups had higher rates of both hospitalization and involuntary admission, and the findings were attenuated but remained statistically significant after adjustment for sociodemographic, clinical, and service-use factors. There was also evidence of effect modification by gender, with African males and Caribbean females having particularly high rates of involuntary admission. There was also evidence of differences across groups in clinical presentation at first hospitalization, with migrants from the Caribbean demonstrating the greatest differences in clinical presentation – in particular, Caribbean migrants were more likely to be perceived as demonstrating aggressive behaviour and posing a risk of harm to others. All migrant groups had a lower prevalence of alcohol and substance use at first admission. Our findings are consistent with the international literature showing increased rates of involuntary admission among some ethnic minority groups with first-episode psychosis. Our findings also suggest that some first-generation migrant groups may differ in clinical presentation at the first hospitalization after psychosis onset. It is unknown whether the observed differences are due to delayed help-seeking, the perception of service providers, or true differences in clinical presentation across ethnic minority groups. Interventions aimed at improving pathways to care could be targeted at these groups to reduce disparities in access to care for people with psychotic disorders.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».