MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2939945445 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbz019.345

T65. RISK OF SUICIDE ATTEMPTS AND SUICIDAL IDEATION IN AN EARLY INTERVENTION PROGRAM FOR FIRST-EPISODE PSYCHOSIS: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

2019· article· en· W2939945445 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Laura Moro, Martín Lepage

Notice bibliographique

RevueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSuicidal ideationPsychiatryPsychosisMedicineAntipsychoticIntervention (counseling)Retrospective cohort studySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Poison controlSuicide preventionPsychologyClinical psychologyMedical emergencyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Suicide is one of the leading causes of premature death among people diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, with first episode psychosis being established as the most at-risk stage of the illness. In the last decades, early intervention for psychosis (EIP) programs have been implanted to improve detection and effective treatment of psychosis. While they have shown promising results in symptoms reduction, treatment adherence and long-term functional outcomes, few studies have investigated the impact of these programs on suicide prevention. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of suicidal behavior among patients admitted to an EIP program for first episode psychosis. We examined the prevalence of suicidality in a representative sample of 355 patients admitted to The Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis of the Douglas Mental Health Institute in Montreal, Canada, from 2006 to 2014. Subjects had never been treated for psychosis nor had taken any antipsychotic medication for more than 30 days prior to admission. Patients who were 18 years and older, had signed consent and were diagnosed with a non-affective psychotic disorder were included in the study. Retrospective data on suicidal behavior were collected from their medical files over a two years period following admission. Reported suicidal ideations, attempts and completed suicides were classified according to the ICD-10 guidelines. Descriptive statistics were calculated to determine means, standard deviations, frequencies and percentages while taking sex differences into account. Altogether, there were two suicide victims, both men, representing less than 0.56% of the sample. Surprisingly, women had a higher rate of attempted suicide (18.87%, 20/106) than men (10.84%, 27/249) prior to entry into the service. While 31 men (12.45%) and 16 women (15.10%) made at least one suicide attempt during the two years of the program, the majority of them did so during the very first 45 days of treatment (48.94%, 23/47). Rates of suicide attempts decreased notably and consistently after three months: only 2.81% of men (7/249) and 3.77% of women (4/106) made an attempt during the second year of the program. Onset of illness appears to be a critical window for suicidal ideations too: close to a third of men (27.30%, 67/249) and women (33.02%, 35/106) considered suicide within the first three months after their entry into the program. Women maintained higher rates of suicidal ideations (22.28%) than men (16.78%) during the first six months, both rates decreasing steadily over time. While prevalence of past suicide attempts in our sample was similar to previous rates published for first episode psychosis populations, this study reports lower rates of completed suicides with a significant reduction of attempts only 45 days after enrollment into the EIP program. Providing better access to effective services for psychosis early on in the course of the illness thus has a beneficial impact on reducing subsequent suicidal behavior. Distinguishing the results by sex allowed us to underline the stronger prevalence of suicide attempts and ideations among women, especially during the first six months of treatment. Further analysis of our sample will examine the influence of psychiatric symptoms’ severity and other demographic factors on the incidence of suicidal behavior.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,091
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,181

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,319
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSchizophrenia BulletinMême sujetAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderTravaux en français237 207