First report of <i>Xanthomonas campestris</i> causing black rot of chard in Cuba
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In March 2016, leaves of chard (Beta vulgaris var. cicla) with blackened veins and v-shaped necrotic lesions on the leaf margins surrounded by yellow halos, were collected from plants growing in the “Organoponico” (a system of urban organic agriculture) in Havana Province, Cuba (Figs. 1-2). The symptoms were similar to those observed in black rot disease on cabbage. To identify the pathogen involved, symptomatic leaves were rinsed with distilled water, surface disinfected using 70% ethanol for 30 seconds, rinsed again with sterile distilled water, and dried at room temperature in a biosafety cabinet. Small sections (less than 1 cm2) from the margins of the necrotic tissue were macerated in sterile 0.85% NaCl solution. Ten-fold dilutions were made of the macerates and 70 μl aliquots were streaked onto yeast extract-dextrose-calcium carbonate (YDC) agar (Wilson et al., 5). The plates were incubated at 28°C for 48 hr. The bacterial colonies were yellow mucoid, circular and convex. The five representative isolates that were tested were all Gram-negative rods, catalase-positive and oxidase-negative. Standard microbiological tests were performed on the isolates (Schaad et al., 3) and indicated that they hydrolysed starch, esculin, gelatin and Tween 80. The isolates were able to use cellobiose, trehalose, glucose, mannose, raffinose, rhamnose, indol, inositol, and sorbitol for growth. The test results indicated that the isolates from chard were Xanthomonas campestris (Xc). Strain pathogenicity was evaluated by spraying 107 CFU/ml (OD600nm approximately 0.05, T60 UV PG Instruments) of the isolates (grown as pure cultures in YDC for 48 hr at 28°C) in a sterile 0.85% NaCl solution onto the leaves of 15-day old chard plants, cultivar ‘White Ribbed’. The plants were grown at 25°C, with 16 hr light and 8 hr darkness in 15-cm plastic pots containing a mixture of 1:1 of sterile soil (Ferralsol eútrico, pH 5.5) and organic material (composted garden waste). A 0.85% NaCl solution was sprayed on the leaves as a negative control. The plants were maintained at a relative humidity >80%, for 48 hr. Symptom development was checked daily. V-shaped, necrotic lesions surrounded by yellow halos developed on the leaf margins 3 to 4 days after inoculation. No symptoms were observed in negative control plants. The bacteria that were re-isolated from symptomatic plants had the same cultural, physiological and biochemical characteristics as those used for inoculation, thus fulfilling Kochs postulates. Two representative isolates, Chard1 and Chard3 were further characterised by amplifying and sequencing their 16SrDNA and DNA gyrase subunit B (gyrB) genes (Hauben et al., 1; Parkinson et al., 2). The sequences were deposited in GenBank, under Accession Nos. MF423473, MF423474, KY770953 and KY964489. BLAST analyses of the 16SrRNA and gyrB gene sequences showed the greatest identity with Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) strains ATCC33913 (AE008922), ICMP4013 (CP012146), ICMP21080 (CP012145), 8004 (CP000050) and XccRC2 (KT964517) (99% homology). However, the 16SrRNA and gyrB gene sequence information could not be used to identify the pathovar of the Xanthomonas strains (Tian et al., 4). Based on these tests, the strains were identified as Xanthomonas campestris. To our knowledge, this is the first report of Xanthomonas campestris in chard. The authors would like to thank the Emerging Leaders in the Americas Program (ELAP) scholarship supported by the Government of Canada for funding this research.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».