MP54-12 PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF GENE EXRESSION CLASSIFIER UTILTY IN MEN AT HIGH RISK OF RECURRENCE FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized: Surgical Therapy III (MP54)1 Apr 2019MP54-12 PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF GENE EXRESSION CLASSIFIER UTILTY IN MEN AT HIGH RISK OF RECURRENCE FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY Todd Morgan*, Linda Okoth, Felix Feng, Anna Johnson, Brian Lane, Susan Linsell, Khurdish Ghani, James Montie, Nick Fishbane, Tara Marti, Marguerite du Plessis, Rohit Mehra, Elai Davicioni, Thomas Maatman, Kirk Wojno, Frank Burks, Paul Rodriguez, Nick Liu, Richard Sarle, David Miller, Michael Cher, and Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative Todd Morgan*Todd Morgan* More articles by this author , Linda OkothLinda Okoth More articles by this author , Felix FengFelix Feng More articles by this author , Anna JohnsonAnna Johnson More articles by this author , Brian LaneBrian Lane More articles by this author , Susan LinsellSusan Linsell More articles by this author , Khurdish GhaniKhurdish Ghani More articles by this author , James MontieJames Montie More articles by this author , Nick FishbaneNick Fishbane More articles by this author , Tara MartiTara Marti More articles by this author , Marguerite du PlessisMarguerite du Plessis More articles by this author , Rohit MehraRohit Mehra More articles by this author , Elai DavicioniElai Davicioni More articles by this author , Thomas MaatmanThomas Maatman More articles by this author , Kirk WojnoKirk Wojno More articles by this author , Frank BurksFrank Burks More articles by this author , Paul RodriguezPaul Rodriguez More articles by this author , Nick LiuNick Liu More articles by this author , Richard SarleRichard Sarle More articles by this author , David MillerDavid Miller More articles by this author , Michael CherMichael Cher More articles by this author , and Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0000556683.01213.eaAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The Decipher assay is a tissue-based genomic classifier (GC) developed and validated in the post-radical prostatectomy (RP) setting as a predictor of metastasis. Retrospective evidence suggests that patients with a high GC score may benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy, while observation may be safe for those with a lower GC score. We sought to conduct the first prospective randomized trial assessing the impact of GC testing on adjuvant therapy use in this setting and report here patient characteristics and risk distribution of the cohort. METHODS: The Genomics in Michigan ImpactiNg Observation or Radiation (G-MINOR) study enrolled 356 participants across 13 sites between January 2017-August 2018. Eligible patients had undergone RP within 9 months of enrollment, had pT3-4 and/or positive surgical margins, and a post-RP PSA <0.1ng/mL. Patients were assigned to either the GC or Usual-Care-Based (UC) group using cluster-crossover block randomization assignments. Patients in both arms received a CAPRA-S derived predicted risk of recurrence. If enrolled during the GC period, the subject and physician were also provided with the Decipher score. Decipher results were assessed centrally in UC patients but were not available to clinicians or patients. Clinical data, including CAPRA-S and Decipher scores, were compared between arms. RESULTS: We report on 356 patients that met the inclusion criteria and whose RP tissue passed the required QC thresholds. Of these patients, 182 (51.1%) and 174 (48.9%) were randomized to the GC and UC groups, respectively. Between study arms, we found no statistically significant difference in the frequency of extraprostatic extensions, seminal vesicle invasion, or surgical margins; nor did we find a difference in distribution of Gleason grade, pre-operative PSA, or CAPRA-S score. Based on the Decipher scores, the risk of metastasis within 5-years of RP had a median (IQR) of 6.0% (2.4%-16.8%) in the GC group and 6.9% (2.6%-19.5%) in the UC group (Wilcoxon p=0.45). CONCLUSIONS: In this biomarker-driven clinical trial of men following RP, baseline clinical variables, CAPRA-S risk, and Decipher scores were similar in the two study arms. With completion of enrollment, these data indicate the study will be appropriately powered to measure rates of post-operative radiation within 18 months from surgery and rates of metastasis within 5 years from surgery. Source of Funding: GenomeDx Biosciences Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI; San Francisco, CA; Ann Arbor, MI; Grand Rapids, MI; Ann Arbor, MI; Vancouver, Canada; Ann Arbor, MI; Vancouver, Canada; Grand Rapids, MI; Royal Oak, MI; Grand Rapids, MI; Ypsilanti, MI; Troy, United Kingdom; Ann Arbor, MI; Detroit, MI; Ann Arbor, MI© 2019 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 201Issue Supplement 4April 2019Page: e789-e789 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2019 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Todd Morgan* More articles by this author Linda Okoth More articles by this author Felix Feng More articles by this author Anna Johnson More articles by this author Brian Lane More articles by this author Susan Linsell More articles by this author Khurdish Ghani More articles by this author James Montie More articles by this author Nick Fishbane More articles by this author Tara Marti More articles by this author Marguerite du Plessis More articles by this author Rohit Mehra More articles by this author Elai Davicioni More articles by this author Thomas Maatman More articles by this author Kirk Wojno More articles by this author Frank Burks More articles by this author Paul Rodriguez More articles by this author Nick Liu More articles by this author Richard Sarle More articles by this author David Miller More articles by this author Michael Cher More articles by this author Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».