Introduction: Diversity on the Stage English-Canadian Drama in the New Millennium
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Diversity on the Stage English-Canadian Drama in the New MillenniumEnglish-Canadian Drama has a long history and its beginnings go back to the 18 th century.However, what is called "professional Canadian theatre," only noticeably developed in the second half of the 20 th century.Before that, Canadian theatre had plays produced by amateur companies and theatres, but was mainly dominated by plays from English, American and French authors that toured Canada.A milestone for the emergence of an indigenous Canadian drama scene and the establishing of a professional Canadian theatre was the founding of the Canada Council in 1957, which promoted and subsidized Canadian playwrights, festivals and competitions.Yet, 1967, the year of the Centennial of Confederation, the World Fair in Montréal and the first and, unfortunately, also the last All-Canadian Dominion Drama Festival, is still considered the key date in the development of modern theatre in Canada.After that, Canadian drama went through various stages to become what it is today, an independent, dynamic and diverse genre recognized in Canada as well as internationally, with Canadian plays translated into other languages and produced around the world. 1 The centennial instilled in many Canadians a national self-consciousness and a hitherto unknown strong feeling of national pride.They became interested in Canadian topics and matters and the decade that followed was dominated by a search for identity and a view towards what it means to be Canadian.Thus, in the 1970s many plays dealt with Canadian issues trying to contribute their share to a definition of a Canadian identity and authors confronted their audiences, for example, with historical themes, immigration or the conflict between English and French Canada, but they also thematized regional aspects, as, for example, life in the North or in the prairies and the influence nature and the vastness of the country have had on people's lives and thinking.However, from the 1980s on, Canadian authors started to turn more and more to universal themes, but, above all, reflected in their plays the growing ethnic and social diversity of Canadian society.In 1972, Pierre Elliot Trudeau, Prime Minister at the time, proclaimed the policy of multiculturalism, which was officially incorporated into the Canadian constitution in the 1980s.With the influx of the so-called "new Canadians," particularly from Southeast Asia, China, and the Caribbean, a multiplicity of races, languages and cultures became a prominent characteristic of Canadian society.1 For more or less comprehensive surveys of contemporary Canadian Drama and further relevant articles and publications, see Antor (2005); Glaap (2003; 2005a; 2005b); Knowles and Riley (2017); Nothof (2008);Wasserman (2008;2012;2013).See also Ric Knowles's book series Critical Perspectives on Canadian Theatre in English (CPCTE), whose twenty-one volumes dealing with diverse topics were published from 2005-2011 by Playwrights Canada Press, and New Essays in Canadian Theatre (NECT), the series that replaced it in 2011, with already eight volumes so far.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,014 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,027 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».