An Investigation of the Relationship among Conformity, Communication, and Anxiety in Medical Education
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Health care members can face challenging situations when learning and working within multidisciplinary teams, such as when they are confronted with information that is contrary to their own understanding and knowledge. Consequently, some medical team members could feel pressure to conform to peers if they are required to make decisions. Over the years, many researchers in the field of psychology have defined that conformity occurs when an individual follows a course of action that is socially acceptable or in agreement with a majority of group members, even when this actions seems incorrect. In examining why group members might conform, some studies have suggested that poor communication and anxiety may be reasons for conformity behaviour; however, this possibility has not yet been clearly examined. The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship among learners’ communication competency, anxiety, and conformity behaviours in simulation exercises. Thirty male and female participants of various ages, medical specialties, and positions (i.e., medical clerks and residents) were observed in a simulation lab at Rockyview General Hospital in Calgary, Canada. Three measures were used in this study to observe the participants’ behaviours: A List of Potential Conformity Behaviours (LPCB), the Non-Technical Skills (NOTECHS) system, and the State Anxiety Inventory (SAI). Participants were also interviewed to explore their reasons for conforming. The study results showed that individuals with higher leadership and managerial skills exhibited more verbal and non-verbal behaviours. The anxiety levels of participants were found to be unrelated to their verbal and non-verbal behaviours, but changes in anxiety levels were associated with more verbal behaviours. Also, no relationship was found among the communication skills of participants and their anxiety levels. Finally, no link was established among conformity status, communication skill, and anxiety. Many participants also justified their feelings of pressure to conform during the study’s simulation exercises and also in clinic as related to medical hierarchies and their own knowledge level. Additionally, some medical situations, such as dealing with emergencies and participants’ concerns about their image in front of other team members, may create pressure to conform. Although this study’s results showed no significant relationship among conformity, communication, and anxiety, it enhances our understanding of the complexity of studying the relationship among different constructs
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».