In memoriam: Paul Fisch (1959–2018) our dear friend, pioneer of γδ T cell research, esteemed scientist, and dedicated clinician
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the wake of the sudden passing of Professor Paul Fisch, colleagues, collaborators and friends shared their thoughts on Paul's significant contributions to γδ T cell research and the scientific community at large. In 1968, shortly after the Russian invasion and occupation of Czechoslovakia, Dr Arthur Fisch, an Auschwitz survivor, relocated with his wife and 8-year-old Paul from Bratislava to Bad Neustadt an der Saale (West Germany). Paul studied medicine with an internship in Neurology in Cologne. After residency in Internal Medicine in Würzburg, Paul joined Paul Sondel's group at the Carbone Cancer Center at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, as a Leukemia Society of America Fellow. He was then awarded a German Research Foundation scholarship to work with Terry Rabbits at the Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge, UK. Paul returned to Germany as a group leader and Leukemia Society Fellow in the Department of Hematology and Oncology at the University of Freiburg, completing a Habilitation degree in Immunology under Thomas Boehm. Paul was then awarded the prestigious Heisenberg scholarship, joining Hans-Georg Rammensee's department at the University of Tübingen, where he completed a Habilitation in Immunology and Molecular Genetics. There he also received the Artur-Pappenheim-Award from the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology. In 1998, Paul returned to Freiburg as Professor of Molecular Pathology at the Institute for Clinical Pathology. In 2016, on his return from a scientific trip to Buenos Aires, Paul suffered a fall causing two vertebral fractures. Subsequent medical intervention and further complications thereof ultimately led to his death on 26 November 2018. Paul was a true pioneer of γδ T cell research, interested in multiple facets of the cells’ biology. Drawing scientific insight from meticulous investigation of human clinical data and cell culture systems, Paul made profound contributions to our understanding of γδ T cells, and to cancer immunology more broadly. After the wholly unanticipated discovery of the TCRγ chain1 and the subsequent discovery of γδ T cells,2, 3 some immunologists doubted that γδ T cell antigen recognition would differ from that of αβ T cells. However, word emerged from the Sondel lab in Wisconsin that – incontrovertibly – peripheral blood γδ T cells kill haematological malignancies in the absence of known MHC I or MHC II elements. The young clinician scientist Paul Fisch spearheaded these studies, bringing his findings to the 1990 International Workshop on the ‘Specificity and Function of γδ T cells’ at Schloss Elmau in Bavaria, Germany. Paul's time in Madison was fundamental to both his professional and personal life. Not only Paul's scientific discoveries,4-6 but also his friendships from those years would carry on for the rest of his life (Figure 1). In his seminal paper on γδ T cell specificity, Paul was one of the first to describe the molecular mimicry that allows γδ T cells to be shaped by infections but also to recognize tumour cells.5 In addition, Paul showed that γδ T cells can be subdivided into distinct subsets according to their cytotoxic responses,6 and that while inhibitory receptors typically found on NK cells likewise control γδ T cell cytotoxicity against Daudi lymphoma targets,7 γδ T cells are functionally distinct from NK cells.4, 6 These important discoveries set the landscape for a wave of studies about the role of NK receptors on γδ T cells, and their innate immune responses in tumour immunity,8, 9 which remains a very active research field.10, 11 With these early studies, Paul moved a large and important stone into place on the pathway to recognizing γδ T cell biology as unique and clinically profound. Indeed, Paul's work has proven prescient, as reflected in the wealth of strategies under development to harvest this potential. Biotech company founders in the γδ T cell space agree that Paul's discoveries provided scientific underpinnings that have enabled progress towards clinical trials. Beyond his early work, Paul continued to make crucial contributions as a sharp, fair reviewer and critical discussion partner for these companies. Naturally, Paul's research also continued in this vein, with recent papers on enhancement of tumour cell killing via manipulation of the γδ T cell antigen receptor 12, 13 and analysis of γδ T cells infiltrating triple-negative breast cancers.14 Paul not only thought about science, he also loved performing experiments! His keen interest in how natural phosphoantigens activate γδ T cells led Paul to bring a huge dry pellet of Daudi cells to Jean-Jacques Fournié in Toulouse for chromatographic separation. Careful analyses revealed only trace amounts of these very labile metabolites, unfortunately an unpublishable result. Undeterred, the duo screened a collection of ~2000 natural product extracts that Jean-Jacques had assembled during family holidays. Paul consistently observed activating compounds in these samples, pointing to ubiquitous stimuli for these unconventional T lymphocytes. More recently, while studying the diversity of γδ T cell expansions in immunodeficient patients and analysing the underlying mechanisms, Paul substantially improved the TCRγ and δ spectratyping method through intense laboratory experimentation.15 Paul was a central figure in the γδ T cell arena, highly respected for his honesty, work ethic and outstanding commitment to research. Paul's eminent role was honoured with his appointment as a chairman for the 2010 γδ T cell meeting in Kiel, Germany. Then, when the next organizers were unable to host the following conference, Paul stepped up and, together with Wolfgang Schamel, rescued the 2012 γδ T cell meeting on short notice. Paul wrote a conference grant application to the German Research Foundation that, hastily signed on the hood of Paul's car under a street lamp on a dark and drizzling Sunday evening, was thankfully successful!16 Paul was also important to the γδ T cell community on a personal level. Paul warmly welcomed researchers from other fields and befriended newcomers at γδ T cell conferences. Deeply committed to family, Paul would sometimes bring one of his children to γδ T cell meetings, and could carry on discussions about the unexpected characteristics and multifunctionality of γδ T cells while picking out colourful doughnuts! Not without some measure of unforeseen disarray, Paul was a generous and reliable collaborator, and helped junior and senior researchers alike gain a step up into the γδ T cell world by freely sharing his expertise and support. Paul inspired a new generation of scientists to pursue greater knowledge of γδ T cells. Many scientists cloning γδ T cells use Paul's protocol,4 often accompanied by his personal guidance. Paul also collaborated with clinicians outside of the γδ T cell field, studying patients with inherited immunodeficiencies and analysing the consequences of hypomorphic mutations in genes critical for VDJ recombination.17 This intriguing work was the beginning of several interesting discoveries in this area spanning over a decade, the most recent published in Blood in 2016.18 Paul's additional non-γδ T cell studies included thymoma-associated immunodeficiencies19 and hematopoietic cell transplantations.20 Paul was a quiet and humble person, with a demeanour that belied his vast intelligence. In his calm, friendly and reassuring way, he treated his conversation partners as equals, thereby instilling confidence in those who sought him out. It was easy to speculate and hypothesize with Paul, as he was an excellent listener, was very well read and his comments were thoughtful, pragmatic and to the point. Paul stood by his ideas, which collaborators and competitors alike sometimes found challenging, but they would always recognize the benefits of his input nonetheless. Paul's way of thinking might affectionately be described as a sort of ‘creative chaos’, as might his appearance, but his mind was sharp and analytical. Paul was a loyal friend, and an encouraging and generous mentor. He was quirky, yet warm and open not only with friends, but also with collaborators and students; discussions often went beyond science, to include family, philosophy or politics, sometimes over döner kebab or cheesecake and fine coffee. Those who were close to him appreciated Paul's special sense of humour, humanity and kindness. In his final year, Paul impressed all those around him with his energy and scientific drive, despite his failing health. Paul's unstoppable vision was to develop the use of γδ T cells for anticancer immunotherapy. As such, he mustered his remaining strength, will and passion to rally scientists to form a German consortium to analyse the role of γδ T cells in cancer, and submitted a funding proposal to the Deutsche Krebshilfe. When awarded an invitation to proceed, Paul fought his ill health to prepare for the defence in viva voce. With his iron will to advance science, Paul disregarded his deteriorating health, travelling to Bonn to defend his dream. On this unforgettable day, those with him shared moments of excitement, laughter, anger, eagerness and empathy. Despite his weakened state, Paul was following his passion and was therefore happy. He passed away a few days later, never having learned the outcome. The news of Paul's death came as a shock to all who knew him. Paul was a rare combination of kindness of heart and keenness of mind, and we feel very lucky to have had him as a friend and colleague. He brought us an abundance of beauty, inspiration, originality, authenticity, kindness and love. We sincerely hope Paul's wife Anja, daughter Nora and sons David and Aron will find some comfort and solace in knowing what an indelible impression Paul left on so many of us. He did not need a long life for us to measure. It was, rather, we who needed his life to be longer, and though he is gone, his unconditional love for science will continue to inspire us. This piece was a truly collaborative effort based on heartfelt contributions from Ilan Bank, Willi Born, Eric Champagne, Matthias Eberl, Stephan Ehl, Jean-Jacques Fournié, Adrian Hayday, José Villacorta Hidalgo, Jürgen Kuball, Lawrence Lamb Jr, Susana Minguet, Hans-Heinrich Oberg, Immo Prinz, Hans-Georg Rammensee, Wolfgang Schamel, Karin Schilbach, Paul Sondel and Daniela Wesch. Our sincere thanks go to the Fisch family for confirming the accuracy of dates and places, and for providing Paul's photo (Figure 2). The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».