Cultural rights at the workplace in Canada: towards post-industrial citizenship?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Res_eng:In classic industrial relations and labour law theory, “Industrial citizenship” remains strongly linked to the idea of a “collective autonomy” of the workplace. In a fordist perspective, the workplace is seen as homogenous, with workers evolving in highly unionized settings and holding more of the same cultural background. The workplace is highly institutionalized, with strong unions facing a powerful employer. Labor rights are based upon collective bargaining and guaranteed by a kind of neutral adjudication, that of grievance arbitration. Seen in this way, “Industrial citizenship” celebrated the (partial) victory of collective autonomy in the sense of Hugo Sinzheimer or of “droit social” within the thought of Georges Gurvitch. Of course, such industrial citizenship, the idea that basic civil, political and social rights for the workers are to be gained by way of collective bargaining at the level of the workplace, was quite idealized: citizenship at the workplace was made possible by the combined effects of Welfare State interventionism and of centralized or decentralized collective bargaining, not by worker’s struggles alone. Though quite univocal, the idea of “industrial citizenship” nevertheless reflects a part of the story, when industrial relations systems, in North-America, seemed for ever well in place. Nowadays, the two pillars of industrial relations in North-America are in crisis: there is a decline of collective bargaining throughout United States and Canada (even in strongly unionized Quebec) and a generalized crisis of the Welfare State. According to their former proponents, there is a demise of industrial citizenship and the idea now appears obsolete, in a era of globalization. Cultural rights play a role in this process: there seems to be a growing fragmentation of the workforce, where minority groups (in a statistical or sociological sense) are fighting for recognition, dignity and equality of rights (meaning, in most cases, reasonable accommodation without undue hardship), often bypassing unionized forums to put their grievances directly to the judiciary. In Canada and Quebec, a constitutionalizing process is going on as regards labour law, dividing the labour law and industrial relations community between “chartists” and “travaillistes” (the former being partisans of a labour law strongly influenced by the charters of rights and freedoms, which have constitutional status in Canada and Quebec). Far from seeing in this constitutionalizing process a negative trend adding to the demise of industrial citizenship, the author will argue that the “Wertrationalisierung” upon which this movement is based opens the way for a renewed “post-industrial citizenship” founded upon constitutional guarantees of both social and cultural rights at the workplace.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,047 | 0,022 |
| Communication savante | 0,017 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».