MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2943496044 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30264-5

Global patterns in monthly activity of influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, and metapneumovirus: a systematic analysis

2019· review· en· W2943496044 sur OpenAlexaff
You Li, Rachel M Reeves, Xin Wang, Quique Bassat, W. Abdullah Brooks, Cheryl Cohen, David P. Moore, Marta C. Nunes, Barbara Rath, Harry Campbell, Harish Nair, Sozinho Acácio, Wladimir J. Alonso, Martín Antonio, Guadalupe Ayora‐Talavera, Darmaa Badarch, Vicky L. Baillie, Gisela Barrera-Badillo, Godfrey Bigogo, Shobha Broor, Dana Bruden, Philippe Buchy, Peter Byass, James Chipeta, Duc-Anh Dang, Carla Cecília de Freitas Lázaro Emediato, Menno D. de Jong, José Alberto Dí­az-Quiñónez, Lien Anh Ha, Rodrigo Fasce, Luzhao Feng, Mark J Ferson, Ángela Gentile, Bradford D. Gessner, Doli Goswami, Sophie Goyet, Carlos G. Grijalva, Natasha Halasa, Orienka Hellferscee, Danielle Hessong, Nusrat Homaira, Jorge Jara, Kathleen Kahn, Najwa Khuri‐Bulos, Karen L. Kotloff, Claudio F. Lanata, Olga López, Maria Renee Lopez Bolaños, Marilla Lucero, Florencia Lución, Socorro Lupisan, Shabir A. Madhi, Omphile Mekgoe, Cinta Moraleda, Jocelyn Moyes, Kim Mulholland, Patrick K. Munywoki, Fathima Naby, Thanh Nguyen, Mark P. Nicol, D. James Nokes, Daniel E. Noyola, Daisuke Onozuka, N. S. Palani, Yong Poovorawan, Mustafizur Rahman, Kaat Ramaekers, Candice Romero, Elizabeth P. Schlaudecker, Brunhilde Schweiger, Phil Seidenberg, Eric A. F. Simões, Rosalyn Singleton, Sujatha Sistla, Katharine Sturm‐Ramirez, Nungruthai Suntronwong, Agustinus Sutanto, Milagritos D. Tapia, Somsak Thamthitiwat, Ilada Thongpan, L. Gayani Tillekeratne, Yeny Tinoco, Florette K. Treurnicht, Claudia Turner, Paul Turner, H. Rogier van Doorn, Marc Van Ranst, Benoît Visseaux, Sunthareeya Waicharoen, Jianwei Wang, Lay‐Myint Yoshida, Heather J. Zar

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet Global Health · 2019
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRespiratory viral infections research
Établissements canadiensCentre for Global Health Research
Organismes subventionnairesFogarty International CenterStatens Serum InstitutFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol UniversityFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn UniversityMedical Research CouncilSanofi PasteurDuke Global Health Institute, Duke UniversityNational Institutes of HealthNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious DiseasesInnovative Medicines InitiativeNational Health Laboratory ServiceUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical CampusUniversiteit AntwerpenUniversity of Cape TownChinese Academy of Medical SciencesMahidol UniversityInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleSouth African Medical Research CouncilUniversity of EdinburghUniversity of WarwickUniversity of OxfordGlaxoSmithKlineImperial College LondonChulalongkorn UniversityMurdoch Children's Research InstituteWellcome TrustUniversitat de BarcelonaNational Research FoundationJawaharlal Institute Of Postgraduate Medical Education and ResearchEuropean Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and AssociationsSchool of Medicine, Duke UniversityPfizerUniversity of RochesterKU LeuvenU.S. NavyCenters for Disease Control and PreventionUniversity of MelbourneUniversidad Autónoma de San Luis PotosíCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterChildren’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research InstituteChina Scholarship CouncilU.S. Department of DefenseSanofiAstraZenecaRijksuniversiteit GroningenNovavax
Mots-clésHuman metapneumovirusVirologyMetapneumovirusVirusRespiratory systemInfluenza A virusParamyxoviridaeMedicineHuman Parainfluenza VirusBiologyRespiratory tract infectionsViral diseaseInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, and metapneumovirus are the most common viruses associated with acute lower respiratory infections in young children (<5 years) and older people (≥65 years). A global report of the monthly activity of these viruses is needed to inform public health strategies and programmes for their control. METHODS: In this systematic analysis, we compiled data from a systematic literature review of studies published between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2017; online datasets; and unpublished research data. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported laboratory-confirmed incidence data of human infection of influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, or metapneumovirus, or a combination of these, for at least 12 consecutive months (or 52 weeks equivalent); stable testing practice throughout all years reported; virus results among residents in well-defined geographical locations; and aggregated virus results at least on a monthly basis. Data were extracted through a three-stage process, from which we calculated monthly annual average percentage (AAP) as the relative strength of virus activity. We defined duration of epidemics as the minimum number of months to account for 75% of annual positive samples, with each component month defined as an epidemic month. Furthermore, we modelled monthly AAP of influenza virus and respiratory syncytial virus using site-specific temperature and relative humidity for the prediction of local average epidemic months. We also predicted global epidemic months of influenza virus and respiratory syncytial virus on a 5° by 5° grid. The systematic review in this study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018091628. FINDINGS: We initally identified 37 335 eligible studies. Of 21 065 studies remaining after exclusion of duplicates, 1081 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 185 were identified as eligible. We included 246 sites for influenza virus, 183 sites for respiratory syncytial virus, 83 sites for parainfluenza virus, and 65 sites for metapneumovirus. Influenza virus had clear seasonal epidemics in winter months in most temperate sites but timing of epidemics was more variable and less seasonal with decreasing distance from the equator. Unlike influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus had clear seasonal epidemics in both temperate and tropical regions, starting in late summer months in the tropics of each hemisphere, reaching most temperate sites in winter months. In most temperate sites, influenza virus epidemics occurred later than respiratory syncytial virus (by 0·3 months [95% CI -0·3 to 0·9]) while no clear temporal order was observed in the tropics. Parainfluenza virus epidemics were found mostly in spring and early summer months in each hemisphere. Metapneumovirus epidemics occurred in late winter and spring in most temperate sites but the timing of epidemics was more diverse in the tropics. Influenza virus epidemics had shorter duration (3·8 months [3·6 to 4·0]) in temperate sites and longer duration (5·2 months [4·9 to 5·5]) in the tropics. Duration of epidemics was similar across all sites for respiratory syncytial virus (4·6 months [4·3 to 4·8]), as it was for metapneumovirus (4·8 months [4·4 to 5·1]). By comparison, parainfluenza virus had longer duration of epidemics (6·3 months [6·0 to 6·7]). Our model had good predictability in the average epidemic months of influenza virus in temperate regions and respiratory syncytial virus in both temperate and tropical regions. Through leave-one-out cross validation, the overall prediction error in the onset of epidemics was within 1 month (influenza virus -0·2 months [-0·6 to 0·1]; respiratory syncytial virus 0·1 months [-0·2 to 0·4]). INTERPRETATION: This study is the first to provide global representations of month-by-month activity of influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, and metapneumovirus. Our model is helpful in predicting the local onset month of influenza virus and respiratory syncytial virus epidemics. The seasonality information has important implications for health services planning, the timing of respiratory syncytial virus passive prophylaxis, and the strategy of influenza virus and future respiratory syncytial virus vaccination. FUNDING: European Union Innovative Medicines Initiative Respiratory Syncytial Virus Consortium in Europe (RESCEU).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,056

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,035
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0070,015
Bibliométrie0,0210,024
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,174
Tête enseignante GPT0,489
Écart entre enseignants0,315 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations551
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Lancet Global HealthMême sujetRespiratory viral infections researchTravaux en français237 207