MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2943555463

Gender in the transition to sustainable energy for all: From evidence to inclusive policies

2019· article· en· W2943555463 sur OpenAlex
Joy S. Clancy, Andrew Barnett, Elizabeth Cecelski, Shonali Pachauri, Soma Dutta, Sheila Oparaocha, Annemarije Kooijman

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueIIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueEnergy and Environment Impacts
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesFP7 International CooperationDeutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale ZusammenarbeitDepartment for International DevelopmentUniversity of Cape TownUniversity of TwenteGovernment of the United KingdomMultiple Sclerosis Scientific Research Foundation
Mots-clésTransition (genetics)Energy transitionBusinessPolitical scienceEconomic growthEconomicsMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Universal energy access targets are unlikely to be met unless energy policies are aligned to women's as well as men's energy needs, their assets, skills, limitations and capabilities, and existing gender norms This research has found that energy policies that do not explicitly target women often result in inequitable access to energy services between men and women.The reasons for this are related to differences between men and women in their energy needs, which are a function of societal norms and resulting differences in responsibilities, as well as differences in men's and women's capacities to access energy services.These differences are frequently institutionalised, resulting in differential access to energy, to appliances, and to the potential benefits of energy services.Paying attention to these differences can help achieve more genderequitable outcomes.Finally, local policies and regulations, as well as awareness of social norms, are crucial to ensure access to energy services for both men and women.The research team also found that even in cases where a gender-aware policy is in place, the implementation may lag behind, mainly because of the approaches adopted and the processes within the organisations implementing the policy.Achieving gender equality outcomes therefore requires not only a transformation in energy policy, but also a change in processes, and changes within the organisations that drive these processes.Involvement of women in energy-system supply chains is good for women and their families, and it is good for businessThe involvement of women in energy-system supply chains as entrepreneurs and employees -particularly in non-traditional roles -is a win-win situation.The energy supply chain offers women an opportunity to earn an income which can enhance their own welfare, as well as the welfare of their families.It can also build their self-confidence and agency, challenging gender norms in their households and communities.When women have discretion over their earnings, they tend to spend on education, healthcare and their children's welfare.For energy businesses, women can bring a unique value proposition as entrepreneurs.When given the right opportunities, they are eager to learn new skills, can deliver energy services to their communities with a high level of trust, and perform as well as men, even without any additional support.In particular, they are able to leverage existing social networks and form trusting relationships with potential customers -especially other women.However in order to realise this potential, women need to be supported through a comprehensive package of support, including capacity building in technology, business skills and leadership; marketing, promotion and distribution; access to finance; and one-to-one mentoring.At the same time, they have to be supported to overcome prevalent social and cultural barriers (e.g.lower literacy; lower access to finance, education, land, and mobility; burden of care work, etc.).Under-investment in overcoming these barriers is likely to perpetuate poverty and gender inequality.Agenda looms, there is a need to do better.Research generated through this programme can catalyse action to move further, faster.Building evidence on gender and energy

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,899
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,992

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle