MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2943927359 · doi:10.34624/jshd.v1i1.2680

P04 - Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes: the influence of maternal body mass index and gestational weight gain

2019· article· en· W2943927359 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrícia Rosinha, Rosa Dantas, Teresa Azevedo, Isabel Inácio, Isabel Albuquerque, Ana Catarina Garrett, Joana Guimarães

Notice bibliographique

RevuePROA-UA · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineGestational diabetesObstetricsBody mass indexOverweightNeonatal intensive care unitPregnancyWeight gainGestational ageGestationObesityPediatricsInternal medicineBody weight

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Due to the growing prevalence of obesity, more women are overweight in early pregnancy (1). Previous studies demonstrated that pre-obesity/obesity is associated with adverse neonatal and obstetric outcomes, namely pre-eclampsia, cesarean delivery, prematurity, macrosomia, neonatal intensive care unit admissions and stillbirth (2,3). There is also evidence that excessive gestational weight gain is associated with an increased risk of gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes (and, inclusively, pharmacological therapy), delivery by cesarean section, postpartum weight retention, macrosomia and neonatal intensive care unit admissions (4,5). Some studies also shown that obese women tend to have an earlier gestational diabetes, more insulin resistance with increased risk of type 2 diabetes, which might lead to a poorer long-term prognosis (6). Objective: To evaluate the influence of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on blood glucose levels at diagnosis of gestational diabetes, obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Methods: Retrospective observational study including women with gestational diabetes and follow-up at Baixo Vouga Hospital Center between January 2015 and June 2018. Multiple gestation pregnancies, cases of loss of follow-up and stillbirths were excluded. Pregnant women were divided in 4 categories according to pre-pregnancy body mass index: low weight (<18,5 Kg/m2), normal weight (18,5-24,9 Kg/m2), pre-obesity (25-29,9 Kg/m2) and obesity (≥30 Kg/m2). Categorical variables were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test, association was assessed by Pearson correlation and, posteriorly, logistic regression was performed. Statistic analysis was performed with SPSS 24. Results: 462 cases of pregnant women, medium age of 32,65 years (SD 5,45) and medium body mass index of 27,29 Kg/m2 (SD 5,57), with no significant differences in terms of macrosomia and gestational diabetes on previous gestation between maternal body mass index categories. In pregnant women with normal body mass index a familiar history of diabetes was found in less than 50% of cases, while in women with low weight, excessive weight or obesity the percentage of familiar history of diabetes was found in more than 50% (p 0,001). With respect to the trimester of diagnosis of gestational diabetes, 53,7% of women with normal body mass index and 55,8% with obesity were diagnosed in the first trimester (p 0,011). Body mass index positively and significantly correlated with fasting glucose level in the first (r=0,213; p 0,001) and second (r=0,210; p 0,001) trimester, even though not correlating with glucose level at 60 and 120 minutes. In what weight gain was concerned, 44,9% women with pre-obesity and 40,2% with obesity had excessive weight gain (p<0,05) and 65,1% of obese women required pharmacological treatment (p 0,05). There were no relevant differences between categories in terms of pre-eclampsia, hydramnios and prematurity, but gestational hypertension was more frequent in obese women (p 0,004). Although there were no differences in terms of neonatal morbidity, the majority of cesareans (40,3%) and large-for-gestational age birthweight (50%) occurred in women with obesity (p<0,05 and p 0,035, respectively). By adjusting for maternal age on logistic regression, body mass index had a predictive value only for macrosomia (adjusted OR 1,177 (1,006-1,376) p 0,041). Body mass index and weight gain were positively correlated with birth weight (r=0,132 p 0,005 and r=0,188 p 0,005 respectively), but not with gestational age. Conclusion: Maternal obesity is associated with a higher probability of diagnosis of gestational diabetes in the first and fasting hyperglycemia in the second trimester, a consequence of associated insulin resistance. Overweight women require, more frequently, pharmacological therapy and, similarly to previous studies, are associated with gestational hypertension and cesarean delivery. However, in these women, there was no increase in the number of stillbirth or pre-eclampsia. Although Infants of obese women were, more frequently, macrosomic, there was no association with an increase of neonatal morbidity. References: • Goldstein RF, Abell SK, Ranasinha S, Misso M, Boyle JA, Black MH, et al. Association of Gestational Weight Gain With Maternal and Infant Outcomes. JAMA [Internet]. 2017 Jun 6 [cited 2019 Mar 17];317(21):2207. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28586887 • Hung T-H, Hsieh T-T. Pregestational body mass index, gestational weight gain, and risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes among Taiwanese women: A retrospective cohort study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2016 Aug [cited 2019 Mar 17];55(4):575–81. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27590385 • Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Shapiro JL, Kenshole AB. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregestational and gestational diabetes mellitus, and the influence of maternal obesity and weight gain: the DEPOSIT study. Diabetes Endocrine Pregnancy Outcome Study in Toronto. QJM [Internet]. 2001 Jul [cited 2019 Mar 17];94(7):347–56. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11435630 • Viecceli C, Remonti LR, Hirakata VN, Mastella LS, Gnielka V, Oppermann MLR, et al. Weight gain adequacy and pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev [Internet]. 2017 May [cited 2019 Mar 17];18(5):567–80. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28273690 • Papazian T, Abi Tayeh G, Sibai D, Hout H, Melki I, Rabbaa Khabbaz L. Impact of maternal body mass index and gestational weight gain on neonatal outcomes among healthy Middle-Eastern females. Cardoso MA, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2017 Jul 17 [cited 2019 Mar 17];12(7):e0181255. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28715482 • HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet [Internet]. 2002 Jul [cited 2019 Mar 17];78(1):69–77. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12113977

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,013

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePROA-UA→Même sujetGestational Diabetes Research and Management→Travaux en français237 207→