MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2943958087 · doi:10.1111/nmo.13622

Exciting news from the editors of Neurogastroenterology and Motility

2019· editorial· en· W2943958087 sur OpenAlexaff
Albert J. Bredenoord, Kirsteen N. Browning, j. j. galligan, Maura Corsetti, Stephen Vanner, Adam D. Farmer

Notice bibliographique

RevueNeurogastroenterology & Motility · 2019
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSpaceflight effects on biology
Établissements canadiensHotel Dieu HospitalQueen's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPublishingEditorial boardLibrary sciencePublicationPolitical scienceManagementLawComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dear Colleagues, We are writing you to share some important and exciting news about the journal. As you are aware, Neurogastroenterology and Motility is the official society journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). The societies use the journal to stay into contact with their members and publish scientific work of society members and others interested in the field of Neurogastroenterology and Motility. Wiley, the publisher, owns the title of the journal, markets the journal, and guarantees print editing and publishing of the content. As editors of the journal, we are responsible for managing the scientific content. This includes selecting appropriate scientific topics, evaluating submissions, and directing the peer review process. The Journal Management Committee (JMC) consists of representatives of the publisher and the societies, has a supervisory role, and appoints the editors. Over the last 17 years, Professor David Grundy served as chair of the Journal Management Committee. He has made a tremendous contribution since the inception of the journal, as society member, author, reviewer, and one of the founding editors. He has been an extraordinary JMC Chair but has decided to step down after his many years of service. We are very grateful to David for his huge contribution to our journal. We are pleased to announce that the societies and publisher have appointed a very highly regarded successor. Professor Gary Mawe from Vermont, USA, has been appointed as new chair of the JMC, beginning in May 2019. Dr Mawe is Professor of Neurological Sciences at the University of Vermont and was reviews editor for the journal between 2011 and 2017. We look forward to working with Gary. We have more important news to share with you. Guidelines, protocols, position papers, and consensus statements have become increasingly important for clinical care, patient-related research, and basic science. In order to add more value to our readers, we, and the societies, have decided to place more emphasis on these publications in future issues. Each year, several guideline papers, protocol papers, position papers, and consensus statements will be prepared by authors that have been invited by the editors. Importantly, funds are now available from the publisher to assist in covering the costs of organizing the expert group meetings, productions, and support related to preparing these documents. The societies will announce this opportunity to their membership annually. In order to increase attractiveness of our readership and to promote work published in NMO, at the last Editorial Board meeting in Amsterdam, we decided to replace our current graphical abstract with what we call a “graphical summary” that will be published together with the paper. This will be requested only after the paper has been accepted for publication, and it will be in a format that can be used by readers as a PowerPoint slide in presentations given at scientific conferences and teaching. It is anticipated that this will increase international visibility of the work published in our journal. An impact statement will replace the key points, summarizing the most important findings of the study. This will have a format that can be easily used for social media such as Facebook and Twitter, so we can use new media in an improved way. Our successful media strategy now consists of monthly podcasts, Facebook posts of new articles, and increasing our visibility on Twitter. The steadily growing annual number of submissions is a reflection of the excellent state of our journal and the field of Neurogastroenterology and Motility. Our journal is flourishing thanks to the authors, reviewers, and readers. Thank you for your support of the journal.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,063

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,032
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0120,005
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,015
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,024

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNeurogastroenterology & MotilityMême sujetSpaceflight effects on biologyTravaux en français237 207