Abstract P1-08-12: Trends in incidence of bilateral breast cancer: A Population-based comparative study of the United States and Japan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Previous studies demonstrated that the incidence rate of invasive contralateral breast cancer (CBC) was 5% within the first 10 years after the primary breast cancer (BC). However improving long-term breast cancer survivorship and advancements in diagnostic imaging have resulted in an increased detection of bilateral breast cancer (BBC), and trends of bilateral invasive and in situ breast cancer are not well established. The aim of this study was to assess national trends of BBC incidence of the United States (US) and Japan. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973-2014) and the clinical database of Breast Oncology Center of Cancer Institute Hospital in Tokyo, Japan (Ganken) database (1946-2015) were used to identify nSEER=11,771 and nGanken=1,499 women diagnosed with BBC, respectively. BBC was defined as invasive BC and/or ductal or lobular carcinoma in situ diagnosed in both breasts simultaneously or after primary breast cancer diagnosis. BBC was grouped into synchronous or metachronous BBC by the interval between first BC and contralateral BC; synchronous cases were defined as CBC diagnosed at the same time or within an interval of 1 year from primary BC diagnosis whereas metachronous cases were defined as a diagnosis occuring 1 year following the primary BC. We assessed trends of BBC incidence and characteristics of BBC cases between the two countries. To determine temporal trends in the incidence of BBC and proportion of the characteristics, we compared them using the Cochrane-Armitage test for trend. Results: The rates of BBC have significantly increased in both countries (Table 1, 2) [1975: 2.6%; 2014: 7.5% in SEER (p<0.001), 1946-1980: 3.3%; 2011-2015: 10.7% in Ganken (p<0.001)]. The increase was identified in both synchronous and metachronous BBC. In SEER, 40% of synchronous BBC were found as in situ BC and about 15% of BBC presented as invasive lobular carcinoma. More recently, CBC was more likely to be diagnosed at early stages (in situ and local disease) than in previous years [1975: 65%; 2014: 85% in SEER (p<0.001)]. The interval between first BC and contralateral BC have shortened, and CBC were more likely to be operated simultaneously in both countries [1985: 40%; 2014: 51% in SEER, 1946-1980: 24%; 2011-2015: 74% in Ganken]. [Table 1]Crude rates of BBC in all breast cancer in SEER 19751985199520052014All breast cancer941813618258766016471505BBC and rates (%)249 (2.6%)790(5.8%)1421(5.5%)3336(5.6%)5381(7.5%)Rates of synchronous BC2.1%2.8%2.3%2.6%3.5%Rates of metachronous BC0.5%3.0%3.2%3.0%4.0%BBC: Bilateral breast cancer [Table 2]Crude rates of BBC in all breast cancer in Ganken 1946-19801981-19851991-19952001-20052011-2015All breast cancer47772162280637915241BBC and rates (%)157(3.3%)110(5.1%)188(6.7%)298(7.9%)559(10.7%)Rates of synchronous BC1.0%1.9%2.0%2.7%4.9%Rates of metachronous BC2.3%3.2%4.7%5.2%5.8% Conclusion: In the modern era, the number of BBC cases have increased and are more likely to be found at an early stage. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the usefulness of early detection of CBC and to define the best means to tailor therapy for patients with bilateral disease. Citation Format: Sakai T, Ozkurt E, Desantis S, Wong S, Rosenbaum L, Zheng H, Ohno S, Golshan M. Trends in incidence of bilateral breast cancer: A Population-based comparative study of the United States and Japan [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-12.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».