CHANGES IN ANXIETY LEVEL OF FEMALES WITH FACIAL LESIONS BEFORE AND AFTER PLASTIC SURGERY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Anxiety is very common among our folks. Facial lesions, congenital as well as acquired, result in marked anxiety related to decreased self esteem and confidence particularly in females. These lesions can be addressed by plastic surgery techniques which ultimately cause significant improvement in anxiety level. The aim of the study is to find out changes in anxiety level of females with facial lesions before and after plastic surgery. Methodology: A prospective study conducted in Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan on 102 female patients having lesions on central face. Lesions were operated by plastic surgery techniques. Hamilton anxiety rating scale was applied to rate anxiety level preoperatively as well as 2 months post operatively. Patients’ satisfaction and scar quality was assessed. Data was analyzed by using SPSS. Results: A total of 102 females were included in the study of which 58 (56.86%) were having educational status above matriculation 14 (13.72%) patients from rural background, 56 (54.9%) patients were below 25 years of age and 46 (45.1%) were above 25 years of age. Forty (39.21%) patients were married while 62 (60.78%) were unmarried or single. Twenty four (23.53%) patients were having post traumatic scarring, 24 (23.53%) were with congenital lesions like CMN while 54 (52.94%) were with lipomata or dermal or inclusion cysts on face. Most of the patients (23.5%) were having lesion on medial part of cheeks. Anxiety scoring noted preoperatively was 22.76±5.846. Vancouver grading of postoperative scars was 4.56±1.798. Patients’ satisfactory level was 1-10 on visual analogue scale. A very high percentage (96%) of patients was having marked improvement in their anxiety scores after surgery. Conclusion: Lesions of face, congenital as well as acquired, can add to the baseline anxiety in females irrespective of their age, educational and socioeconomic status. Once we address these facial issues permanently, through surgical methods, the anxiety level is reduced significantly. Keywords: Anxiety, Hamilton Score, Facial lesion, Vancouver grading, Plastic Surgery
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».