20 Years of Rigless ESPs in Alaska; What went Right, What went Wrong, What's Next?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract This paper is not a technical paper about electric submersible pumps (ESP's), instead it traces the 20-year journey that has led to the development and successful application of multiple generations of rigless ESP conveyance systems in a commercial oilfield. The end result, after many lessons learned, is a success story in which over 300 rig interventions have been eliminated over a 20-year period, with savings of 100's of millions of dollars in intervention costs, reduced HSE exposure and many millions of barrels of additional production. Utilization of ESP technology in the West Sak viscous oil field in Alaska is challenging. The unconsolidated nature of the West Sak sands impacts the performance and reliability of conventional ESP systems due to sand production. This challenging environment causes ESP pump erosion and accumulation of sand in the tubing above the pump and in the lower completion below the ESP. The initial development of the West Sak formation was the basis for the original development of the through-tubing conveyed progressing cavity pump (TTCESPCP) in the mid 1990's. With time, the West Sak completions evolved from vertical wells to long horizontals, resulting in production capacity increasing beyond the capabilities of the 3.5 in. and 4 in. TTCESPCP systems. This led to the development of a 4.5 in. through-tubing ESP in the early 2000's. In this design, the PCP of the TTCESPCP system was replaced with a high capacity, centrifugal pump or through-tubing convenyed ESP (TTCESP). With time and successful experience utilizing the TTC systems, it became evident that although the through-tubing technology resulted in significant savings and increased production, the design was lacking in one major aspect – the ability to remove sand accumulation in the 7-5/8 in. production casing below the end of tubing. The inability to perform interventions without pulling the tubing, was leading to expensive and avoidable rig workovers not related to the ESP equipment. The resulting economics drove the development of a through-tubing, slickline (SL) deployed ESP that, when all components are removed, leaves a minimum diameter of 3.80 in. for well interventions below the end of the tubing. The wireline retrievable ESP (WRESP) system was launched in 2005 and was fully commercialized in 2014. Numerous papers have been written on this specific technology and references are provided at the end of this paper. This list does not represent a complete listing of all through-tubing technologies, as there are other systems with substantially different characteristics. This paper will focus only on the through-tubing technology development and evolution in Alaska. It will present the 20-year development history of the Alaskan through-tubing technology, how the system is deployed, answers to frequently ask questions, and as the title suggests – What went Right, What went Wrong, and What's Next? The development and successful commercial deployment of through-tubing ESP systems in Alaska has been a long journey, with many lessons learned in the evolution from conventional ESPs, to through-tubing PCP's and ESP's (TTC or Generation 1 (Gen 1)), to the wireline retrievable ESP (WRESP or Generation 2 (Gen 2)). It should be recognized that both technologies had a development phase, followed by a commercial deployment phase. There were unexpected problems and benefits that were encountered as the technology matured. The technical difficulties significantly increased while advancing from the TTC (primarily mechanical changes) to the WR technologies (which adds the electrical component of a downhole wet connect).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».