MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2944937710 · doi:10.1177/2473974x19849046

A Malignant Cystic Midline Neck Mass

2019· article· en· W2944937710 sur OpenAlexaffabout
H Sigvaldason, Sheena Graham, Raena Buksak, Kumar Alok Pathak

Notice bibliographique

RevueOTO Open · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHead and Neck Anomalies
Établissements canadiensUniversity of ManitobaManitoba HealthCancerCare Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad
Mots-clésMedicineHyoid boneThyroglossal ductEpiglottisThyroid cartilageNeck massLarynxDysphagiaDifferential diagnosisAnatomyTongueThyroidEctopic thyroidThyroid carcinomaRadiologyCystPathologyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Thyroglossal duct cysts (TDCs) are the most common congenital neck cysts.1 They often contain ectopic thyroid tissue (71%), with up to 3% of TDC excisions demonstrating papillary thyroid carcinoma.2 Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) typically arises from salivary glands and has rarely been associated with thyroid tissue or TDC.3 This rare case of concurrent MEC and TDC highlights the differential diagnosis for a midline neck mass. Informed consent was obtained, as was ethics approval from the University of Manitoba Research Ethics Board. A healthy 51-year-old woman presented with an 8-month history of enlarging midline neck mass, with persistent pain, dysphagia, and dysphonia. Examination revealed a 3-cm compressible midline neck mass at the level of the thyroid cartilage, which was firmer to the right of midline. It elevated on tongue protrusion. Fiberoptic nasolaryngoscopy demonstrated submucosal fullness in the base of tongue and right vallecula, with posterior displacement of the right supraglottic larynx. Vocal cords were mobile. Ultrasound identified a solid 2.7-cm right neck mass, separate from a thyroid with small colloid nodules. Computed axial tomography described an irregular 2.9-cm lesion that was more solid laterally and cystic in the midline, centered within the right strap muscles (Figure 1). It straddled the hyoid bone without obvious bone destruction, with suspicion for a midline cystic tract through the thyroid cartilage. There was a mass effect on the supraglottic airway, distortion of the larynx, and no cervical lymphadenopathy. Fine-needle aspiration cytology revealed highly atypical cells in a background of cystic content. A malignancy within a TDC was suspected. A Sistrunk procedure with a submucosal base of tongue resection was performed. Pathology revealed high-grade MEC with associated TDC (Figure 2). The tumor had a high mitotic index (23 per 10 high-power fields), with tumor necrosis and lymphovascular invasion but no perineural invasion. It invaded the hyoid bone and extended focally to inked margins. Adjuvant treatment was discussed at multidisciplinary rounds. Due to positive margins, intensity-modulated radiotherapy was delivered with 70 Gy to the tumor bed and 63 Gy to the vicinity of tumor in 35 fractions. Chemotherapy was considered but not pursued. Further surgical resection was reserved for salvage. She remains free of recurrence at 18 months. Classical presentation of a TDC is a midline neck mass adjacent to the hyoid bone. The differential diagnosis includes ectopic thyroid, thyroid neoplasm, dermoid cyst, sebaceous cyst, lipoma, and submental lymphadenitis. Although ectopic thyroid tissue has been reported within the cyst, rarely with malignant transformation (3%), only 1 previous case of MEC occurring within a thyroglossal duct remnant has been reported.3 In the present case, however, a TDC and a minor salivary gland tumor occurred concurrently in the central neck. Head and neck computerized axial tomography scan images, illustrating the solid and cystic components of the mass: (A) axial view at the level of the hyoid bone and (B) sagittal view. Histopathologic sections: (A) gland formation, (B) positive mucin stain, (C) pleomorphic nuclei and frequent mitotic figures in hematoxylin-eosin stain, and (D) negative thyroid transcription factor 1 immunohistochemical stain. MEC is the second-most common malignancy of minor salivary glands, more frequent in females and in the fifth decade of life.4 Recommended treatment for MECs involves surgery, with local resection for less aggressive tumors and wide resection including involved adjacent structures with possible selective neck dissection for high-grade tumors.4 Radiotherapy is reserved for high-grade tumors and tumors with aggressive features such as perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and metastatic nodes. The RTOG 1008 trial is currently investigating radiotherapy with cisplatin chemotherapy.5 Based on histologic features and imaging, this tumor probably arose from the minor salivary glands of the base of the tongue and less likely from minor mucoserous glands that can be seen in a TDC wall, since the tumor was negative for thyroid transcription factor 1 by immunohistochemistry. This tumor was staged as a T4aN0M0 stage IVa MEC of the minor salivary glands per the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer’s TNM staging system. In this unusual case, MEC arose from minor salivary glands at the base of tongue, presenting as a midline neck mass in association with a concurrent TDC. We had suspected a TDC carcinoma based on the atypical cells identified by fine-needle aspiration cytology. If MEC had been suspected, panendoscopy and wider excision of the mass with frozen section would have been performed to achieve negative margins. Positive surgical margins necessitated adjuvant radiotherapy. Minor salivary gland tumors should be considered in the setting of a malignant midline neck mass, as this can affect disease management. Competing interests: None. Sponsorships: None. Funding source: None. Dr Lester D. R. Thompson provided a pathologic consultation on this case. Dr R. Nason provided a surgical consultation. Heather Sigvaldason, contributed to the conception of the work and acquired data for the work, drafted the work, provided approval of the version to be published, and agrees to be accountable for the work; Sheena Graham, contributed to the conception of the work and acquired data for the work, drafted the work, provided approval of the version to be published, and agrees to be accountable for the work; Raena Buksak, contributed to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work, revised the paper critically, provided approval of the version to be published, and agrees to be accountable for the work; K. Alok Pathak, contributed to the conception of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, critically revised the paper, provided approval of the version to be published, and agrees to be accountable for the work.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,015

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,303
Écart entre enseignants0,281 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2019
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOTO OpenMême sujetHead and Neck AnomaliesTravaux en français237 207