Making Motherhood Work: Women?s Child Support Claims, Race, and the Remaking of Citizenship in South Africa, 1958-2015
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation, tracks the interrelationship between citizenship, kinship, and economy through the lens of claims made by poor South African women for resources to support their children. It is based on 18 months of fieldwork in South Africa that included extended ethnography in the inner-city Point neighborhood of Durban, interviews in isiZulu and English, oral histories, and archival research with court and welfare case files of neighborhood residents. The dissertation demonstrates how the content of citizenship is created and negotiated at the micro-political scale of interpersonal relationship through the everyday processes by which people seek to fashion a secure existence. By detailing women’s labors to garner resources for their families and themselves, this dissertation argues that poor women are shaping the character of citizenship in post-apartheid South Africa and forging new relations between citizens and the state. The critical backdrop to this research is the dramatic transformation of South Africa’s political economy between 1960 and 2015. Alongside a transition that extended democratic citizenship for all, new forms of insecurity and exclusion framed by race, class, and gender, have emerged. The collapse of the waged labor system has made formalizing marriages all but impossible and family life increasingly tenuous, the burdens of which are predominantly shouldered by women who continue to be the primary caregivers of children. This dissertation takes a historical anthropological approach to analyzing the meaning of these political economic shifts by chronicling poor mothers’ livelihood strategies across this period. A key aspect of these strategies is social protection and the political recognition it conveyed. The apartheid-era State Maintenance Grant that once robustly supported a minority of white mothers has been replaced by a radical Child Support Grant (CSG) that now reaches 60% of all South Africa’s children at a total cost of 3.5% of the national budget. However, the CSG targets children, not their caregivers, requiring mothers to look elsewhere for support and recognition. Crucially, women are building resource networks across families, friends, and communities that enable alternative conditions of debt and dependence in ways increasingly independent of marriage. Via this “kinshipping” labor, or the fostering of relations of dependence, this dissertation argues, women are redefining obligations between men and women, persons and communities, citizens and state. This dissertation contributes to scholarship on kinship and citizenship. It shows how projects of social reproduction constitute contingent economic and political relationships that structure people’s lives far more than any totalizing logic. By providing a robust account for how unequal capital accumulation and political power are brought about through the production and maintenance of kinship, this analysis contributes to longstanding discussions within both feminist and kinship theory about the inseparability of the domestic, economic, and political domains. Further, this research challenges geopolitical paradigms that separate the global north from south. South Africa’s state social assistance programs generate issues mirrored in Canada, the US, and Europe, while at the same time unemployment and the postcolonial legacy link it to challenges faced across the African continent and beyond.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».