The (enlightened) perspective of an anthropologist on entrepreneurship and the project
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The (enlightened) perspective of an anthropologist on entrepreneurship and the project An interview with Jean-Pierre Boutinet Jean-Pierre Boutinet is the author of Anthropologie du projet (2012) and Vers une société des agendas, Une mutation des temporalités (2004).The main focus of his work has been on the study of the project through the lens of his expertise as psychologist and anthropologist.This interview is quite relevant to project studies as it nurtures new thoughts on the relationship between entrepreneurship and projects.Boutinet influences in France on the understanding of the emergence and evolution of the word and the concept of project in the Western world has been tremendous.From this perspective, he offers a fresh critical look at the very central notion of time in the context of the project.He questions how the term project is used today and how we tend to dismiss the essence of its very nature for its creativity and meaning.As his work has been published only in French, it has not been discovered by the project management community at large with the exception of a few scholars (e.g.Garel, 2013;Scranton, 2015).We hence take the opportunity provided by this special section to introduce the important hidden elements of project studies to a larger audience.In short, we believe that Jean-Pierre Boutinet's unique perspective enlightens the relationship between entrepreneurship and the project.The format of an interview facilitates a dialogue between these two fields.It allows to critically assess the links between the project approach and that of entrepreneurship in a natural conversation.The interview also situates the notions of entrepreneurship and the project in relation to each other, in their convergence and contrast.The figures of the entrepreneurship and the project are likely to bring creativity and singularity together.Overall, we would like to know more about how Jean-Pierre Boutinet as a psychologist and anthropologist situates and compares the two notions of entrepreneurship and the project, and about the form which a dialogue between these two notions might take, ideally.The interview is organized in seven sections: convergences between entrepreneurship and the project; convergences between temporalities of entrepreneurship and the project; entrepreneurship, bricolage, improvisation and creativity; entrepreneurship and project management; about the entrepreneurial project: project to be completed and interminable project; space and time in the entrepreneurial project; and from the author of the project to the self-employed person, through the injunction to autonomy.1. Convergences between entrepreneurship and the project I: What is your critical view of entrepreneurship and the project?JPB: spontaneously, if I had to say something about the existing relationship between entrepreneurship and the project, I would say that I see a great similarity between these two figures insofar as both are creative processes that solicit the individual or collective actor's capacity to afford themselves the means of producing some novel form or other of technico-social
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,038 |
| Communication savante | 0,013 | 0,019 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,014 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».