MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2945677294 · doi:10.1097/pr9.0000000000000730

Latin American Pain Federation position paper on appropriate opioid use in pain management

2019· article· en· W2945677294 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePAIN Reports · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLatin AmericansMedicineAddictionPopulationMedical prescriptionChronic painPosition paperPosition (finance)PsychiatryBusinessPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthNursingLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

1. Introduction Improper pain treatment is a worldwide public health issue.5,8 Although scientific evidence supports the safe use of opioids,2 there is still significant reluctance around the use of these analgesics. The most significant problem for appropriate pain management has been the negative perception of these analgesics, known as opiophobia.1,7 The “opioid crisis,” characterised by the prolonged and indiscriminate use of prescription opioids seen in some countries, has led to high addiction and mortality rates. This has had a profoundly negative impact on pain management.3,7,8 Furthermore, in Latin America and for most of the world's population, access to and availability of these medicinal products are still inadequate and lead to unnecessary suffering as a result.6,7 Inadequate pain management in Latin American countries may be worsened by the “opioid crisis” that other regions of the world are undergoing,6,7 which is just one of the many reasons that warrants the drafting of this document. Latin American Federation of IASP Chapters (FEDELAT) convened a group of experts from the region (from Mexico to Chile, including the Caribbean) in São Paulo city (Brazil) to prepare a position paper on appropriate opioid use in chronic pain. All recommendations are based on the group's analysis of the needs and particularities of the region. It is hoped that this regional position paper will improve regulations and pain management, as well as prevent abuse and misuse of these medicinal products. Most people dying of terminal chronic diseases in developing countries do not have access to controlled medicinal products for pain management. Worldwide, around 25 million people died in 2015 of terminal chronic diseases. Approximately 80% of these were in developing countries, and many of them died suffering from pain.7 The situation in Latin America regarding access to and availability of opioids is still limited and is below 100 statistically defined daily doses. Countries with the lowest recorded consumption include Guatemala, Ecuador, and Bolivia. In Chile, Argentina, Colombia, Brazil, and Uruguay, opioid consumption has been successfully raised to 200 statistically defined daily doses. However, this figure is still not sufficient for adequate pain management.6,7 There is a lack of publications which have looked at opioid abuse by pain patients in Latin America. There are some data about the prevalence of prescription opioid exposure at least once in a person's life, with an incidence of around 1%. Problems with abuse occur mainly with alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine.4,7 Thus, the perceived abuse risk of opioids in Latin America is very low. 2. Suggestions for Latin America regarding opioid use 2.1. Education Promote training in the safe use of opioid analgesics based on protocols and on scientific evidence. The creation of specific platforms on the website of the FEDELAT and of the Latin American Association for Palliative Care (ALCP) has been suggested, which would contain virtual courses with updated information on indications, management, and precautions for the use of opioids. Promote local training for health care professionals and patients in every country led by scientific and academic organisations in cooperation with FEDELAT and ALCP. Develop educational materials for patients and the general community on appropriate opioid use and the risk of abuse. 2.2. Advocacy and public policy Raise awareness among decision-makers about the need to create pain treatment programmes and promote a balance between sufficient access to controlled substances for medical and scientific purposes and avoiding opioid misuse. Create national guidelines based on international recommendations on appropriate use, such as medicinal product selection, dose calculation, opioid rotation, management of high-risk patients, and treatment monitoring. 2.3. Digital prescriptions Promote the creation of a digital registration system which can be used to prescribe opioids, monitor the risk of improper use, and facilitate patient access, disease diagnosis, daily doses, and monitoring of medicinal product stock, and time and duration of prescriptions (ideally for 1 month). This system would also contribute to reliable opioid medicinal product planning and acquisition required by every country. It is recommended that weaker opioids should be available by prescription with a copy kept by the pharmacist, to have more control over those medicinal products that may be potentially abused. Strong opioids must follow international regulations governing narcotic drugs. 2.4. Statistics Promote national systems that register opioid statistics taken from population data, hospital data, and private consultations that will provide official data on the importation, consumption, and distribution of opioids for medical use. 2.5. Multidisciplinary monitoring Training is recommended for pain and palliative care units in every country, consisting of a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary team that ensures appropriate assessment, diagnosis, multimodal therapy, and patient follow-up to minimise the dose and duration of use of prescribed opioids, particularly in patients with nononcological chronic pain. 2.6. Interorganisational cooperation Scientific organisations such as FEDELAT, ALCP, and the Latin American national divisions of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) should develop common plans to improve opioid availability and accessibility, endeavouring to minimise their abuse and misuse. 2.7. Conflicts of interest Support governmental bodies in the implementation of conflicts of interest policies concerning undue influence from all for-profit bodies in tendering, procurement, and marketing of opioid medicinal products. 2.8. Conclusions Public health organisations in Latin America should improve their ability to produce statistics to facilitate greater understanding of the actual situation in the region. It is important that organisations involved in the education, regulation, and marketing of opioid analgesics work together to encourage proper use and monitoring of these medicinal products. These measures could lead to a decrease in opiophobia, which has risen in Latin America. The opioid crisis in Latin America is different to the one currently unfolding in the United States, Canada, and other developed countries. Our current crisis is one of undertreatment and suffering. Disclosures The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,144
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,883

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,242
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle