MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2946487691

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS, PARAGENESIS, AND GEOCHRONOLOGY OF THE ARROW URANIUM DEPOSIT, WESTERN ATHABASCA BASIN, SASKATCHEWAN, CANADA: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PATTERSON LAKE CORRIDOR

2019· dissertation· en· W2946487691 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sean Hillacre

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésParagenesisGeochronologyGeologyGeochemistryStructural basinUraniumArchaeologyGeomorphologyGeography
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan hosts the world’s highest-grade uranium deposits, which are commonly spatially associated with structural zones that have undergone episodes of brittle reactivation, alteration, and polyphase fluid movement. The most recent significant discoveries of uranium mineralization in the Athabasca Basin have been associated with a series of geophysical conductors along a NE-SW-trending structural zone, termed the Patterson Lake corridor, in the southwestern portion of the Basin. The Arrow Deposit, which is along this trend and hosted exclusively in the basement rocks below the Athabasca Supergroup sandstones, has an indicated mineral resource of 179.5 Mlbs U3O8 at a grade of 6.88% U3O8, and is the largest undeveloped uranium resource in the Basin. The present study examines the relationships between the ductile framework and brittle reactivation of deep-seated structures, mineral paragenesis, and radiogenic and stable isotope analyses of uranium mineralization at the Arrow Deposit. Hand sample examination, structural analysis from oriented drill core, thin section microscopy, and electron microprobe analysis has been used to generate a detailed paragenesis of the Arrow Deposit, which was used to select mineralized samples for isotopic analysis that were categorized based on cross-cutting relationships, textures, and chemical composition. Paragenetic information was integrated with structural analysis utilizing over 18,000 measurements of foliation, fractures, veins, shears, mylonites, breccias, cataclasites, fault gouges, and plunge and trend of slickenstriae and ductile lineations. Through this study, the structural system at Arrow has been interpreted as a partitioned, sinistral strike-slip dominated, brittle-ductile fault system of complex Riedel-style geometry. The Arrow system developed along sub-vertical, NE-SW-trending heterogeneous high strain zones (named the A1 through A5 shears) along the limb of a regional-scale fold, and further evolved through episodic reactivation events creating small-scale brittle fault linkages oblique to, and connecting the main fault zone, allowing for migration of fluids, alteration of host rocks, and precipitation of uranium. Uranium mineralization at Arrow occurs as botryoidal, cubic, vein, semi-massive, and massive uraninite (UO2), as well as younger alteration phases including uranium-silicates (e.g. coffinite) and uranyl oxy-hydroxide minerals (e.g. uranophane). Regression of the concentrations of substituting elements including Fe, Si, and Ca give an average chemical age of initial uraninite crystallization of approximately 1,425 Ma. In-situ secondary ionization mass spectrometry (SIMS) U-Pb ages obtained in this study (~700, ~1,200, and ~1,300 Ma) are comparable with those obtained from the Shea Creek area and reveal numerous episodes of uranium mineralization, remobilization, and alteration associated with multi-stage deformation during the Proterozoic. The geochronological data on uranium mineralization and post-mineralization alteration and resetting events broadly correspond to major orogenic events that have affected the North American shield. The oldest uraninites (~1,300 to 1,425 Ma) are botryoidal, cubic, and semi-massive occurrences commonly replacing clay minerals and micas. Younger (~1,200 and ~700 Ma) uraninites occur as cubic crystals, semi-massive and massive lenses, and form the matrix of breccias. The youngest uraniferous minerals are the products of alteration and/or remobilization of uraninite through subsequent fluid-flow events. This study demonstrates that the U–Pb isotope systematics of uranium-rich minerals from the Arrow Deposit have been affected by paleo-fluid-flow events that were controlled by regional and global-scale tectonic events. The precision and high spatial resolution of the SIMS method allowed for measurement of δ18O values from ~10 μm spots on uraninites from the Arrow Deposit. The range of δ18O values (-34.5 to -15.2 ‰) are low, and comparable to those obtained from other unconformity-type deposits in the Basin such as Cigar Lake and Shea Creek. The low δ18O values indicate that the uraninite likely underwent recrystallization via interaction with late, relatively low temperature Athabasca fluids with δ18O values in the range of -20 to -16 ‰. The other discoveries along the Patterson Lake corridor (Triple R, Cannon, Bow, Harpoon, Spitfire) have not been studied in detail, and so this study of the structural context of the Arrow Deposit is important as it emphasizes that protracted reactivation of deep-seated NE-SW-trending structures and their subsidiaries was a fundamental control on uranium mineralization in the SW Athabasca Basin. Continued studies integrating mineral paragenesis, geochemistry, and structural geology with geochronological context will aid in understanding the evolution of uranium deposits within the recently established southwestern Athabasca Basin uranium camp.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,052
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,105

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,220
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetGeochemistry and Geologic MappingTravaux en français237 207