15 The Experiences of Bereaved Family Caregivers with Advance Care Planning for Children with Medical Complexity
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Medical technologies and technological advances have resulted in a growing number of children with medical complexity (CMC), many of whom would not have survived previously. Despite these advances CMC are still at high risk of morbidity and mortality during childhood. Advance Care Planning (ACP) is defined by the Canadian Paediatric Society as “the process of discussing life-sustaining treatments and establishing long-term care goals.” Currently the pediatric literature regarding ACP has been largely limited to the intensive care setting and the oncology population. There is a dearth of information focussing on ACP for CMC and that includes bereaved family caregiver’s views. Bereaved caregivers have the unique ability to reflect upon ACP through their child’s whole disease course and end of life experience. To explore the ACP experiences of bereaved family caregivers of CMC who have experienced the entire illness trajectory, including their child’s death. A qualitative approach was applied, allowing for in-depth data collection through semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used to recruit bereaved caregivers of CMC until thematic saturation was reached. The interview guide was developed through expert consultation and was refined iteratively throughout the interviews. Questions assessed caregivers’ experiences with ACP discussions, their feelings about those conversations and their perceptions about whether ACP affected the end of life experience. Each participant provided written, informed consent and interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Three research team members used content analysis to independently code the interviews. 13 bereaved caregivers of CMC completed 12 interviews ranging from 40–80 minutes in length. All caregivers of CMC had participated in ACP discussions and sometimes found them to be overwhelming and frustrating in the moment. However, all caregivers reported that they now understand and appreciate the importance of the discussions. Four major themes emerged from the data describing caregiver’s feelings and experiences regarding Advance Care Planning: 1) influencers of the ACP experience, 2) positive experiences, 3) negative experiences and 4) the influence of ACP on end of life. Bereaved caregivers provided a unique perspective, highlighting the importance and the benefits of ACP discussions. They also revealed various ways in which ACP conversations could be improved. These insights will be helpful in guiding educational tools for health care providers working with CMC in the future.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».