MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2947699678 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz066.065

66 High Cost Drug Policies in Canadian Children’s Hospitals

2019· article· en· W2947699678 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Rieder, Aidan Pucchio

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePharmaceutical studies and practices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFormularyMedicineHealth careFamily medicinePediatricsPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Over the past decade a number of highly promising new therapeutic entities have become available. Many of these new treatments are biologicals or antibodies rather than conventional small molecules. These drugs offer great promise but come with the potential for potent adverse effects as well as creating challenges for access. Many of these new treatments are very expensive and are frequently not on hospital formularies. There is no comprehensive pan-Canadian strategy on how to best provide access to these drugs for the children at most need and how to address the rapidly evolving world of novel therapeutics for children. To evaluate how this issue is being addressed nationally we conducted a survey among the 17 Departments of Paediatrics across Canada. In Paediatrics high cost drugs are most commonly used in academic child health care centres. Our objectives were to; I) Determine what the policies as to provision of high cost drugs in Canada’s academic child health care centres, ii) Determine what the challenges facing Canada’s academic health care centres were in providing access to novel therapies to children at most need and iii) Explore possible solutions to these challenges. To explore these questions we conducted a survey of the 17 Departments of Paediatrics across Canada through the Paediatric Chairs of Canada and faciliated through Childrens Healthcare Canada. A questionnaire was sent to all Department Chairs asking the following four questions; 1) Does your hospital have a policy for how to deal with high cost drugs that are not covered by provincial health insurance or are not on the hospital formulary? 2) If so, how does this policy work? 3) If not, how are these therapies addressed? 4) What do you think is the best approach to provide access to high cost drugs for children? Department Chairs agreed to voluntarily participate in the survey. After completion of the survey areas of uncertainty were followed up by interviews with the respective Department Chairs. The issue of high cost drugs for children was noted to be a growing issue by all Departments of Paediatrics across Canada. There was a wide variability in how requests for high cost drugs were dealt with, ranging from a somewhat ad hoc case-specific response to a formal process involving decision making groups representing physicians, hospital administration and hospital pharmacy. No single best practice was identified. There was a concensus that this has emerged as a major problem in terms of access having a significant impact on hospital budgets with no end in sight as the therapeutic revolution in biological, factor and molecular therapy continued. It was acknowledged that traditional payment measures have failed to address this and some changes in provincial policy towards drugs for children may have negatively impacted access to these therapies. There was also a wide concensus that a pan-Canadian approach was needed, with suggestions including a national formulary for drugs for children that could provide evidence and recommendations to provincial funders as well as the suggestion of a pan-Canadian pharmacare plan for children. An urgent need for national leadership on this issue was also identified. Historically the per capita expenditure for pharmaceuticals for a Canadian child was in the range of $450. With the advent of new therapies that cost in the tens of thousands of dollars new approaches to drug evaluation and drug access for Canada’s children are urgently needed. This is a concern for all Departments of Paediatrics across Canada and pan-Canadian solutions are needed to address how to best treat Canada’s children at highest need.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,441
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,806

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,328
Écart entre enseignants0,312 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetPharmaceutical studies and practicesTravaux en français237 207