MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2947713370 · doi:10.1353/lvn.2019.0007

The Sea and Nineteenth-Century Anglophone Literary Culture ed. by Steve Mentz and Martha Elena Rojas

2019· article· en· W2947713370 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueLeviathan · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Science and Medicine
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrivilege (computing)NarrativeHistoryArt historySociologyLiteratureArtLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Sea and Nineteenth-Century Anglophone Literary Culture ed. by Steve Mentz and Martha Elena Rojas Mary K. Bercaw Edwards STEVE MENTZ AND MARTHA ELENA ROJAS, EDS. The Sea and Nineteenth-Century Anglophone Literary Culture London and New York: Routledge, 2017. xii + 196 pp. With rising sea levels, global warming, sovereignty issues around the opening of the Northwest Passage, and the probable disappearance of an entire nation, the Maldives, the field of Maritime Studies has new urgency. The 2011 conference at the John Carter Brown Library in Providence, Rhode Island, organized by Steve Mentz, that gave rise to this book is but one example of the spate of seminars, articles, print and online journals, Maritime Studies programs, Marine Science departments, and scholarly works attesting to scholars' increasing attentiveness to the importance of the oceans. Mentz and Rojas note in their introduction that this collection brings together ten essays "that treat the ocean as invitation, not barrier" (1). True to that spirit, the collection is highly interdisciplinary in its discussions of seaweed, scientific writing, Arctic exploration narratives, underwater paintings, the tools of navigation, and a "life-sized sex doll" dredged up from the bottom of the sea (166). The essays cross genres, periods, and nationalities. Mentz and Rojas, both literary scholars, keep their discipline's claims modest: "Literary studies cannot claim any special privilege in knowing the 'real' ocean, and it does not assert any 'essential truths.' Instead, it offers a variable record of how human beings have imagined themselves interacting with our watery planet" (4). The ten essays are divided into three categories: "wet globalization," "salt aesthetics," and "blue ecocriticism," terms Mentz introduced in his monograph, Shipwreck Modernity: Ecologies of Globalization, 1550–1719 (2015). "Wet globalization" emphasizes the role of the ocean in global trade, what Mentz and Rojas call "a wetter, saltier globalism [that] requires a sharper focus on the disorientation of the sea" (6). This section begins with Siobhan Carroll's investigation of William Falconer's 1762 poem The Shipwreck, "his critically acclaimed hybridization of the georgic with the nautical manual" (15). I teach this poem every semester and have always been intrigued by Falconer's juxtaposition of [End Page 156] poetic diction and nautical terminology. Carroll writes that the "overt mission" of the 1762 version was indeed "a linguistic one" (15): to educate the British in the language of the sea. She goes on to examine the political resonance of Falconer's 1764 and 1769 revisions, namely how the ocean's capacity to challenge sovereign power also challenged British imperialism. The collection's second essay, by historian of science Helen Rozwadowski, takes up the writing of voyagers: naturalists, whalemen, yachtsmen, passengers, officers' wives, and especially scientists. She explains that the term "scientist" was coined in 1833 by British physicist William Whewell, who "spent his career articulating what it was to do science and who could practice science—and he did so especially through his studies of tides" (33). Thus the term science was from its inception associated with the maritime world and its writing. She notes that ocean scientists reported their work not only in research journals but also through popular voyage narratives. She gives the example of Lt. Samuel P. Lee, who commanded the USS Dolphin during the first transatlantic deep-sea sounding survey: one-third of his 300-page report is a narrative of the voyage. Hester Blum has long been interested in the Arctic, as evident in her keynote, "Melville in the Arctic," delivered at the Eleventh International Melville Conference in London and printed in Leviathan 20.1. In her essay for this volume, she concentrates on a curious figure, Charles Francis Hall, who went to the Arctic to search for relics of the lost John Franklin Expedition. Hall lived with the Inuit for more than seven years, "an extraordinary act for a white, Western explorer in the mid-nineteenth century" (47). Hall's story is so lively and engaging that the reader is immediately drawn in, but Blum writes with the larger purpose of showing "how knowledge circulated in the oceanic spaces of the polar regions, whether through autodidactic, empirical, professional, or intercultural channels" (49). Blum examines the narratives Hall produced...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,123
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,523

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,184
Écart entre enseignants0,179 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle