CARDIoGRAM celebrates its 10th Anniversary
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It is 10 years since CARDIoGRAM entered the scientific lexicon. It is the acronym for the Coronary ARtery DIsease Genome wide Replication and Meta-analysis, a global consortium that has set new standards in the exploration of the genetics of coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial infarction (MI).1,2 Even beyond these diseases, understanding the genetics of many other complex disorders and evaluation of the causal role of biomarkers associated with CAD have enormously benefited from the work of the consortium. The roots of CARDIoGRAM lie in an initial collaboration between the authors bringing together genome-wide association studies of CAD from the British Heart Foundation Family Heart Study (undertaken as part of the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium) and the German MI Family Heart Study.3 They recognized that much larger studies were needed to confidently identify genetic variants associated with CAD, given the modest effect size of individual variants and the statistical penalty created by the simultaneous analysis of half a million or more variants. Initially, 10 groups joined forces to create CARDIoGRAM. Founding principal investigators and respective studies of CARDIoGRAM were Nilesh J. Samani and Alistair Hall (WTCCC); Heribert Schunkert, Jeanette Erdmann, and Christian Hengstenberg (GERMIFS); Sekar Kathiresan (MIGen); Eric Boerwinkle, and Christopher J. O'Donnell, (CHARGE consortium); Robert Roberts, Ruth McPherson, and Alex Stewart (Ottawa Heart Study); Dan Rader and Muredach Reilly (PennCath/MedStar); Tom Quertermous and Tim Assimes (ADVANCE); Winfried März and Reijo Laaksonen (LURIC/AtheroRemo); Stefan Blankenberg (CADomics); and Unnur Thorsteinsdottir (deCODE). The first chairs were Samani and Schunkert (Figure 1). Heribert Schunkert, Jeanette Erdmann, Sekar Kathiresan, and Nilesh J Samani (from left to right) in 2008 at a Cardiogenics consortium meeting held in Lübeck, Germany. Three years thereafter, CARDIoGRAM merged with the C4D consortium4 and other groups in order to form CARDIoGRAMplusC4D, which since then has continued the discovery and functional exploration of genetic variants causing coronary heart disease.5,6 It was important for the founders to initiate a collaboration that is solely academic in nature. The only objective was to produce scientific information and detailed genomic data for exploration. It was the expressed intention to avoid transfer of any ownership between different parties joining the initiative in order to focus exclusively on the scientific work. At present work of the consortium has identified 164 chromosomal loci that contain genetic variants that are genome-wide significantly associated with CAD risk.7 Many more loci can be considered good candidates as their false discovery rate is below 5%.6 A foundation of this success was the principal decision to make aggregated data available to the scientific community. Thereby any researcher can download the summary statistics from the website of the consortium (www.cardiogramplusc4d.org) to study whether any specific genetic variant displays association with CAD. Using this valuable data set, a series of ever-larger meta-analyses detected multiple novel and rare genetic variants affecting the risk of CAD (Figure 2). Important publications and milestones achieved by CARDIoGRAM and CARDIoGRAMplusC4D. During these 10 years of joint research the number of loci with Genomewide significant association to coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction increased to 164 and likely will grow even further. To date, more than 70 publications have been published by the CARDIoGRAM consortium and its successor CARDIoGRAMplusC4D, many in leading journals such as, Nature, Nature Genetics, the New England Journal of Medicine, Lancet, and the European Heart Journal. But the unique resources created by CARDIoGRAMplusC4D were not only about the discovery of new loci causing CAD. The consortium set the stage for conducting Mendelian randomisation studies that by now have changed the perception of causal factors in the aetiology of CAD.8 The genetic risk for CAD mediated by most of the genetic variants discovered by CARDIoGRAM and its successor, CARDIoGRAMplusC4D, are repeatedly confirmed to be through unknown mechanisms emphasizing the opportunity for discovery of novel pathogenetic pathways other than the well-known cholesterol and other conventional networks.9,10 These observations have inspired researchers to pursue elucidation of these risk meditating pathways which will greatly contribute to the pathogenesis of CAD and provide a treasure trove of new targets for drug discovery and development.11 As an example, HDL-cholesterol is now questioned as a causal factor in the aetiology of CAD,12 while triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, or LP(a) are now established as being more than risk markers but rather factors that cause the disease.13–17 These findings are enormously important for informing the decision-making in drug development. Indeed, it is strongly recommended that directing therapeutic strategies to novel targets should be supported by genetic findings that document the causal roles of respective mechanisms.18 Likewise, the causal role of (classic) risk factors for atherosclerosis was explored in a new light as the genetic variants linked to hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, smoking, telomere length, and many other traits were explored in the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D data set.19–22 Moreover, it became possible to explore systematically the overlap of CAD with other diseases such as large artery stroke,23 arterial aneurysms,24 or arterial dissection.25 Indeed, the genetic underpinnings of CAD were found in patients with heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, aortic stenosis, atrial fibrillation, and premature death to name the most relevant conditions in this respect.26,27 The same is true for anthropometric and social factors, as these may also play a role in the disease aetiology. For example, height28 or educational attainment29 were also seen in a different light after the respective genetic variants were studied for their association with CAD in the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D data set. The data accumulated by CARDIoGRAMplusC4D has also provided the basis for the construction of polygenic risk scores which are now creating a new paradigm for risk prediction of CAD.30 Such scores may have as much, if not greater clinical impact, than the development of new therapies based on the discoveries of the consortium. Beyond its scientific contributions the consortium may also be seen as a success story of the funding instruments of the European Union and other funders. Indeed, the EU-consortia Cardiogenics (coordinated by Heribert Schunkert, 2006–11) and Procardis (coordinated by Hugh Watkins, 2007–11), and AtheroRemo (coordinated by Reijo Laaksonen, 2008–13) formed the core of what became CARDIoGRAMplusC4D in 2011. Even today, the groups meet on bi-monthly calls (chaired by Erdmann and Samani) and at international meetings whenever possible. The photo shows Samani, Schunkert, Erdmann, and Kathiresan at a meeting in 2008 in Lübeck. Finally, beyond the pure science, CARDIoGRAM and CARDIoGRAMplusC4D are examples for the power of multinational collaborations as opposed to attempts by individual groups to solve a task. Conflict of interest: none declared. References are available as supplementary material at European Heart Journal online.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,133 | 0,128 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».