Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dr. Robert L. Van de Castle passed away on January 29, 2014, at the ripe age of 86. To me he was very memorable man. I met him first at the Spring Review Meeting at the Foundation for Research on the Nature of Man (Institute for Parapsychology) in Durham, North Carolina during the year that I spent there in 1969-1970. Rhine held review meetings twice year and invited dinner speaker from outside. This time the speaker was Robert (Bob) Van de Castle, who had in the mid-50s spent some time with Rhine at the Duke Parapsychology Laboratory. There he investigated personality correlates of PK performance and was research assistant to Gaither Pratt in his project for the military involving homing behavior of pigeons. After Bob's talk at the review meeting, we got into conversation. This conversation had decisive effect on my life, for which I will always be grateful. He invited me to join 1-year internship program in clinical psychology that was being established at the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. He also guaranteed me time to work on my doctoral dissertation that 1 was writing with Professor Hans Bender in Freiburg, Germany. That was the begining of long friendship. Whenever 1 visited Charlottesville in the ensuing years 1 always made it point of seeing Bob and to spend some time with him. Bob was born in Rochester, New York, on November 16, 1927, as the son of Van de Castle (translates to Omar from the castle), who was born in Belgium, and Canadian mother. He studied at the Universities of Syracuse and Missouri and obtained his PhD in Clinical Psychology from the University of North Carolina in 1959. A turning point in Bob's life was his pionering work with Calvin Hall at his Institute of Dream Studies in Miami, Florida. Their joint book The Content Analysis of Dreams (Hall & Van de Castle, 1966) became classic on quantitative research on dreams. It established norms and revealed prominent differences in the content of dreams between men and women, just to mention one of their findings. When Bob was invited to join the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Virginia, he was offered the opportunity for further research on dreams and sleep, and the Sleep and Dream Research Laboratory of the University of Virginia Medical Center was establised with Bob as director. There I took part in weekly research meetings and found it an enriching experience to follow what research Bob and Peter Hauri--his associate--were doing at the time. Apart from his clinical work, Bob's life was divided between his research and writing on dreams and on the paranormal, of which the dream part was much greater. He was the author of Our Dreaming Mind (Van de Castle, 1994), which was described as landmark by Monte Ullman, masterpiece by Henry Reed, and a sweeping compilation unsurpassed in the literature for its scope by Stanley Krippner. Bob published over hundred papers in peer-reviewed journals, wrote articles in many leading newspapers and popular magazines, and discussed dreams on national TV and radio shows. He felt it important to familiarize the public with research on the fascinating realm of dreams. He played prominent role in the International Association for the Study of Dreams, was their president in 1985, and presented regularly at their conferences, both in the US and abroad. He conducted numerous workshops on dreams on both sides of the Atlantic. I read in his bibliography that his first publishing venture--on May 14, 1950--was in no less newspaper than The New York Times. The title of the article was Honeymoon Abroad: Cycling and Hitch-hiking Helped to Stretch $100 All the Way Across Europe (Van de Castle, 1950). Bob was always an enterprising man; he travelled widely and knew how to enjoy life. For the readers of the JP, Bob's involvement with the paranonnal will be of particular interest. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».