Medieval Studies at the Newberry Library: A Report on New Approaches
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Medieval Studies at the Newberry Library:A Report on New Approaches Karen Ann Christianson, Christopher D. Fletcher, and Isabella Magni Medievalists today live in trying times. Alongside the inherent difficulties in studying the Middle Ages—learning languages, deciphering sources, developing research questions, etc.—faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates in all fields of medieval studies face daunting institutional challenges complicating the task of studying medieval cultures. Among others, professors are frequently forced to defend the value of medieval studies to skeptical administrations; graduate students face a troubling professional future with an increasingly constricting job market; and undergraduates interested in the Middle Ages find a shrinking number of medieval courses available as departments promote more general and global offerings. Understandably, these challenges also negatively affect the essential academic tasks of research, writing, and teaching medieval studies. Indeed, many departments, under pressure to draw in large numbers of undergraduates and to shorten graduate students' time in a PhD program, have discontinued offering the technical training necessary to study medieval cultures. Thus, students must learn vital skills (such as paleography, codicology, diplomatics, and prosopography) informally from individual professors, through self-study, or not at all. After graduation, scholars often find themselves teaching as adjunct instructors for little pay and bereft of the resources, including special collections, online journals, and databases, that were available to them at their previous institutions. No simple solution will fix the challenges facing medieval studies, but clearly academia itself cannot provide all the answers. Scholars and students both can benefit from institutions outside of universities that offer opportunities and resources for research, training, and collaboration that individual universities may not be able to offer on their own. The Newberry Library is one such institution. In this essay, we will provide a brief overview of how this independent research library [End Page 113] in Chicago helps to provide training and resources medievalists need to do their work in these challenging times. The Center for Renaissance Studies and the Newberry The Newberry Library owes its existence to Walter Loomis Newberry, a wealthy industrialist in Chicago. Newberry had long advocated for the creation of a great library in Chicago, and he left half of his estate for the creation of one should his daughters die without heirs. When the contingency in Newberry's will went into effect in the late nineteenth century, Chicago had already opened a public library, so the decision was made to establish a research library that would be free and open to the public. A few years later, after consultation with other recently established repositories in Chicago, the Newberry's leadership decided to focus collection development on humanities fields. Since the opening of the current library building in 1893, the Newberry has consistently offered its rich collection of around 1.5 million books, 15,000 linear feet of manuscripts, 500,000 maps, 200,000 pieces of sheet music, and other materials for the public's admiration and study.1 As the Newberry's collection grew over the years, the library became a desirable place for scholars of medieval studies to perform research. Its identity as a haven for medieval studies was strengthened by the foundation of the Center for Renaissance Studies (hereafter CRS) in 1979. CRS works with a consortium of institutions, originally consisting of five Chicago-area universities—the University of Chicago, Northwestern University, Loyola University Chicago, the University of Illinois at Chicago, and Northern Illinois University—and has always aimed to provide a place for students and faculty to take classes, work with original sources, and enjoy collaborations that would not have been possible at a given institution on an individual basis. Today, CRS has expanded significantly on these core principles, offering a variety of programming and resources for a consortium that now numbers around fifty universities from the United States, Canada, Europe, and the United Kingdom. At the same time, CRS also participates in the larger mission of the Newberry to promote the humanities and provide opportunities for the general public to engage with the library's rich collection of materials. What follows is a brief overview of how the center seeks to accomplish these goals through its programming and its digital resources. Programs for Graduate...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,016 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,019 | 0,015 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,015 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,028 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».