Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Since the end of the 19th century, the world has experienced a dynamic shift from traditional living arrangements to a more modern approach, regional habitation - the rise of suburbanization. Suburbanization allowed, for the first time in history, the general population to comfortably relocate their families and lifestyles to the threshold of developed areas (cities, metropolitan areas) while maintaining moderate accessibility to local amenities and a sense of personal space (suburbanization). Prior to this phenomenon, the majority of people lived outside of the city cores, typically in rural areas with farming and agriculture as a means of income and survival (Harris, R., 2004). This lifestyle was demanding and tedious, but an integral part of development. Though there is no specific start point suburban development was an inevitable outcome of the influx of population and industrial technologies. This new concept does have many points of origin ranging from the North American expansion during the industrial revolution to the European exodus due to famine or governmental regimes. The summation of these conditions brought Canada the United States and other developed countries to a pivotal point in history that would continue to today. The purpose of this report is to provide a detailed understanding about the timeline of the suburbanization movement and accurately depict the relevant events. The common misperception is that the suburban lifestyle is typically viewed as the 1950's answer to a modern lifestyle catering to automobile ownership and independence. However this perception while partially correct is actually the aftermath of century long regional development immigration and industry's effect on the social and economic environments. The objective then is to document depict and compare the various aspects that influenced the suburbanization movement and define the specific events that shaped the course of both countries positively and negatively. When taking into account the amount of historical documentation there are many aspects to consider when trying to define the suburbanization movement: What it is? How did it come to be so prevalent? What where the significant moments? Why was it so important to national development? To understand the movement and in the interest of relatability there are two countries in particular that share mutual backgrounds and historical commonality: Canada and the United States. These two countries shared similar views and developed concurrently during the late 1800's through to post World War II. Key political and social aspects surrounding suburbanization will be reviewed in a common time period mutual to both nations. Thus this report shall examine the period from the middle of the 19th century through to the post war 'baby boom' era during the early 1950's where each country demonstrated substantial regional development hardships and unintentional outcomes arising from the concept of suburbanization.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».