Horse Racing and British Society in the Long Eighteenth Century by Mike Huggins
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Horse Racing and British Society in the Long Eighteenth Century by Mike Huggins Allyson N. May Huggins, Mike – Horse Racing and British Society in the Long Eighteenth Century. Woodbridge, UK: The Boydell Press, 2018. Pp. 316. Mike Huggins is a well-established authority on aspects of British popular culture, and sporting history in particular, in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, with an especial although not exclusive expertise in the history of horse racing. His earlier works include Kings of the Moor: Yorkshire Racehorse Trainers 1760-1900 (1991); Flat Racing and British Society 1790-1914: A Social and Economic History (2000); Horseracing and the British 1919-1939 (2003); and The Victorians and Sport (2004). In this new study, Huggins turns his attention to an earlier period, focusing on the social, cultural, and economic origins of what he describes as a "proto-modern sport," both "formative and anticipatory" in its organization and participants (p. 6). Modern racing, in Huggins's view, emerged not as a consequence of industrialization but owed instead to a variety of early modern developments including sporting professionalism, commercialization and increasingly sophisticated methods of financial exchange, and the emergence of a public sphere in which sporting records became an established feature. Regular newspaper reports of racing, including both advertising and race results, helped the sport to become part of a new leisure industry, and racing broke new ground in specialist periodicals, annual calendars that both summarized past results and publicized upcoming events. Coffee houses supported the betting market; certain public houses gained a reputation as "sporting" pubs. Following Stefan Szymanski, Huggins also emphasizes the role of "eighteenth-century associativity" (p. 11) in development of the sport, placing the history of racing within that of the club formation typical of the age. The precise contours of a "long eighteenth century" are somewhat contentious and a matter of interpretation. Huggins has chosen to cover the period from the 1660 Restoration of the monarchy to the end of the Napoleonic Wars, and "Late Stuart and Georgian England" might have been a better descriptor in the title of this book. But in terms of sporting history, the early start date makes sense, reflecting this study's position within the history of popular leisure: the Restoration allowed a resurgence of activities prohibited during the Puritan Commonwealth. It also enables Huggins to contrast the Stuart monarchs' love of the "sport of kings" with the relative indifference of their Hanoverian successors. To whom, exactly, the sport appealed is one of Huggins's key preoccupations. In previous work he has been keen to argue for middle-class enthusiasm for racing, to problematize the standard view of a respectable Victorian middle class which eschewed the pastimes—or vices—of their social superiors. It was not, he has claimed, merely the upper classes who enjoyed the gambling associated with racing. In Horse Racing and British Society, Huggins continues to argue for the broad social appeal of the sport. He acknowledges that in the eighteenth century horse racing was "most important to the predominantly male political and rural elite" (p. 7). But he also argues that it attracted an urban bourgeoisie, including women, and that race meetings were consequently "pan-class" activities, drawing together rich and poor, urban and rural members of society and "articulating [End Page 239] vertical ties" (p. 8) that held it together. This particular sport allowed a "tacitly controlled cross-class mixing" (p. 279) in a way that pugilism or cricket, for example, did not. A similar argument was made by David Itzkowitz, among others, for the development of fox hunting, a sport which would also be linked in the public imagination with a quintessential Englishness. But that broadened participation and appeal came about later, whereas racing had been identified by the Morning Chronicle as Britain's "ancient, authorized and national sport" as early as 1809 (p. 2). Huggins's exploration of his proto-modern sport falls into two halves. In the first three chapters, he focuses on the position of horse racing within eighteenthcentury British society as a whole: the place of "race week" in the country's social life, the gambling associated with the sport, and the relationship between racing and...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».