Fashioning the Canadian Landscape: Essays on Travel Writing, Tourism, and National Identity in the Pre-Automobile Era by J. L. Little
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Fashioning the Canadian Landscape: Essays on Travel Writing, Tourism, and National Identity in the Pre-Automobile Era by J. L. Little Cecilia Morgan Little, J. L. – Fashioning the Canadian Landscape: Essays on Travel Writing, Tourism, and National Identity in the Pre-Automobile Era. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018. Pp. 327. It was all about the landscape, it seems, when nineteenth-century travellers and tourists looked out their railway carriage windows or (more likely) from the deck of a steamer and recorded their impressions of Cape Breton, Quebec's Eastern Townships, the Labrador coast, or the lakes, mountains, and shorelines of British Columbia. In Fashioning the Canadian Landscape, historian J. I. Little has brought together eight previously published essays with two new contributions, along with an introduction and afterword, all of which foreground the role conceptions of landscape played in male travellers' and tourists' impressions of the Dominion. Little argues that notions of the picturesque inflected the accounts left by Canadian and British writers, no matter where the writer's gaze happened to land. Like their contemporaries in other parts of the world, these men were primarily interested in creating representations of landscapes that accorded with their own set of values, those of order, respectability, and British civilization. These depictions, Little argues, also were used in the service of nationalism, particularly for Canadian and British writers who saw geography as playing a critical role in the development of national identities and characters. In contrast, the American writers whose work Little examines were more interested in searching out quaint habitant culture, the "romantic folk culture" of Cape Breton's Highlands (p. 8), or views of the sublime along the coast of Labrador. Yet, no matter what the writers' national vantage point, for the most part their accounts saw people and their varied histories as being of less interest than scenery, a pattern in travel writing about Canada that, according to Little, persisted long into the age of automobile travel and tourism. Republishing one's own work as a collection of essays has its pitfalls, not least of them being that readers may find few new insights. To some extent Little has avoided this problem by providing some new material and by writing a clear introduction and afterword; the former frames these essays well, while the latter suggests the ways in which scholars of twentieth-century tourism and travel in Canada might take up, expand upon, and test his insights and arguments. Furthermore, journal articles and book chapters in other collections do not have [End Page 246] the same impact and weight as a collection of essays with this degree of thematic unity. As I moved from one chapter to another, Little's arguments about the cultural power that the picturesque wielded over these writers becomes more convincing than if I had read articles dispersed in different places over time. The collection has other strengths, not least Little's fluid and engaging style and the clarity of his prose; it also will introduce readers unfamiliar with the field to a range of nineteenth-century travel writing about Canada (and provides a very helpful bibliography of those sources). Little's discussion of tourism at Lake Memphremagog is, from my perspective, one of the particularly strong chapters, since it allows the reader to appreciate the interaction between travel writing and social practices as well as the subsequent changes to the physical landscape wrought by that dynamic. In contrast, other chapters do not give us a clear sense of the reception of these accounts: I would have very much liked to know about the import and impact of their dissemination. Some English Canadian tourists in Britain, for example, hoped not to encounter Kipling's representations of Canada in any form, direct or indirect, ones that Little discusses in chapter 9, "Our Lady of the Snows Revisited." In turn, those images of Canada as a land of agricultural bounty found in George Munro Grant's 1880s Picturesque Canada were foregrounded in the promotional literature disseminated by Canadian immigration agents in Edwardian Britain. That said, Little's contributions to this area provide richness and depth to our understanding of the Dominion's place within...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,027 | 0,012 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».