PS1066 AXICABTAGENE CILOLEUCEL (AXI‐CEL) IN REFRACTORY LARGE B CELL LYMPHOMA: OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS ≥ OR < 65 YEARS OF AGE IN THE PIVOTAL PHASE 1/2 ZUMA‐1 STUDY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Axi‐cel is an autologous anti‐CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy approved in the European Union and United States for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma with ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. In the 2‐year follow‐up of ZUMA‐1, the objective response rate was 83%, with a complete response rate of 58%, and 39% of patients were in ongoing response (Locke et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019). Aims: To assess efficacy and safety outcomes of axi‐cel in patients ≥ or <65 years of age from ZUMA‐1. Methods: Eligible patients with refractory large B cell lymphoma underwent leukapheresis and conditioning chemotherapy followed by a target dose of 2 × 106 anti‐CD19 CAR T cells/kg. The Phase 2 primary endpoint was investigator‐assessed objective response rate. Additional key endpoints were adverse events, overall survival, and levels of CAR gene‐marked cells in peripheral blood. Efficacy was evaluated for Phase 2 patients; safety was evaluated for all treated patients (Phases 1 and 2). Patients were analyzed by age ≥ 65 years vs <65 years. Results: As of August 11, 2018, 108 patients were treated. Patients ≥ 65 years (n = 27) vs <65 years (n = 81) had a median age of 69 years vs 55 years, respectively, and were 81% vs 63% male; 70% vs 36% had an International Prognostic Index score of 3–4, 59% vs 57% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1, 67% vs 72% had ≥ 3 prior therapies, and median tumor burdens were 3790 mm2 vs 3574 mm2. Median follow‐up was 27.1 months for Phase 2 patients (n = 101). The objective response rate for patients ≥ 65 years (n = 24) and <65 years (n = 77) was 92% and 81% (complete response rate, 75% and 53%), respectively, with ongoing responses in 42% and 38% of patients (ongoing complete response, 42% and 35%). The 24‐month overall survival rate was 54% for patients ≥ 65 years and 49% for patients <65 years. Most patients experienced Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (100% of patients ≥ 65 years; 98% of patients <65 years), and 4% of each group (1/27 patients ≥ 65 years and 3/81 patients <65 years) died due to adverse events as previously reported. Grade ≥ 3 neurologic events and cytokine release syndrome occurred in 44% vs 28% and 7% vs 12% of patients ≥ 65 years vs <65 years, respectively. CAR T cell expansion by peak level (43 vs 35 cells/μL) or area under the curve (562 vs 448 days × cells/μL) was similar in patients ≥ 65 years vs <65 years, respectively. Summary/Conclusion: The 2‐year follow‐up of ZUMA‐1 demonstrates that axi‐cel can induce high rates of durable responses with a manageable safety profile for patients ≥ and <65 years. Axi‐cel offers substantial clinical benefit for older patients with refractory large B cell lymphoma who otherwise have limited treatment options.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».