MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2949450398 · doi:10.22067/econg.v10i2.76528

New hypothesis on time and thermal gradient of subducted slab with emphasis on dolomitic and shale host rocks in formation of Pb-Zn deposits of Irankuh-Ahangaran belt

2019· article· en· W2949450398 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammad Hassan Karimpour, Azadeh Malekzadeh Shafaroudi, Zahra Alaminia, Abbas Esmaeili Sevieri, Charles R. Stern

Notice bibliographique

RevueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSlabGeologyOil shaleSubductionGeochemistrySeismologyGeophysicsPaleontologyTectonics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Mississippi Valley-Type (MVT) deposits are epigenetic zinc and lead deposits with minor copper hosted by dolostone, limestone, and locally sandstone in platform carbonate sequences inboard of major orogenic belts (Leach and Sangster, 1993; Leach et al., 2010). The Irankuh-Ahangaran Belt, which is the most important Pb-Zn mineralized zone of Iran, is situated within the Sanandaj-Sirjan tectonic zone. This belt is 400 km in length and 100 km in width. Three deposits including Irankuh mininig district, Ahangaran and Hosseinabad deposits were studied in this article (Fig. 1). The aim of this research is study of thermal gradient of subducted slab and age of formation of Pb-Zn deposits at Irankuh-Ahangaran belt, which is contrary information has been published so far on the type and their formation. Also, chemistry of ore-fluid in MVT deposits and impact of dolomitic and shale host rock on paragenesis, alteration, style, reserves and grade of deposits were discussed.These parameters will certainly be useful for exploration of the hidden MVT type deposits in the Irankou-Ahangan belt. Result and Discussion The Irankuh mineralization is hosted by Cretaceous dolostone and minor Jurassic shale rocks as epigenetic. The constructive thrust fault, which has been cut the Jurassic and Cretaceous host rocks, has played a major role in the rising of fluid and formation of mineralization. Mineralization is occurred as replacement and open space filling (fault breccia, veinlets and cavity of rock) in dolostone and breccia, veinlet and open space filling in shale host rock. The mineral assembelages are Fe-rich sphalerite, Fe- and Mn-rich dolomite, ankrite, galena, minor pyrite, bituminous, calcite ± quartz ± barite within carbonate host rocks, whereas quartz, pyrite, Fe-rich sphalerite, galena, minor chalcopyrite, low Fe-dolomite, bituminous, ± barite ± calcite are important primary minerals at clastic hos rocks (Karimpour et al., 2018). The Ahangaran deposit is very similar to Irankuh in host rock, alteration, paragenesis, and form of mineralization. Thrust fault has a constructive role for occurrence of mineralization and later destructive strike slip and normal faults have caused the displacement and destruction of mineralization. The Hosseinabad deposit is hosted by Jurassic shale, siltstone, and sandstone rocks as vein-veinlets, breccia and open space filling with structural control. Alteratin consists of silicification, chlorite, bituminous, and minor siderite, dolomite and ankerite similar to mineralization hosted by shale in Irankuh district. The mineral assemblages are galena, Fe-rich sphalerite, pyrite, chalcopyrite and minor phyrotite. Due to the lack of a proper dolostone unit in the Husseinabad deposit, mineralization is concentrated in particular areas with low-grade and low-reserves. Based on lithology, alteration, mineralization style, structural control by thrust faults, mineral paragenesis, and comparison with differnet types of Pb-Zn deposits, all deposits of Irankuh-Ahangaran belt are MVT-type. Deep-seated thrust faults formed during the early stages of subduction (~ 70 to 75 Ma), and played an important role in the upward migration of hydrothermal fluids from the basement to shallow depths. The geochronology of pyrite in Irankuh district based on Re-Os method indicate age of Irankuh Pb-Zn mineralization is 66.5 ± 1.6 Ma (Liu et al., 2019). Since the thrust faults have been cut the Jurassic to Upper Cretaceous rocks, and according to the absoulte age determined in Irankuh, the mineralization of this belt have been formed in the age range of 66 to 56 million years ago, mainly in the Paleocene (Fig. 15). Karimpour and Sadeghi (2018) suggested the hydrothermal fluid originated from the dehydration of a hot and young oceanic subducted slab, which liberated Pb, Zn, and other metals, and may have removed metals from rocks and organic material of the continental crust. More than 90% of all the water within the oceanic slab was released in the depth zone of the forearc region (depth of 30 to 50 km) (Karimpour and Sadeghi, 2018). In the depth zone, Mg-rich silicate minerals (such as antigorite, hornblende, chlorite, talc) have broken and the produced fluid is rich in Mg and Fe (Fig. 17). The ore-fluid of MVT deposits is Si-poor and Fe- and Mg- rich. Such fluid is mineralized on the hosts of the dolstone (Irankuh and Ahangaran) or Shale-Siltstone (Hossein Abad, and part of Irankuh and Ahangaran). There are significant differences in the type of paragenesis, alteration, shape, dimensions, reserves and grade in the deposits of this belt, which is controlled by the host rock type. Based on all lithological evidence, alteration, shape of mineralization, existence of thrust faults, mineral paragenesis and specific geological and geographic location, it can be used to exploration of the hidden MVT deposits in this belt. References Karimpour, M.H., Malekzadeh Shafaroudi, A., Esmaeili Sevieri, A., Shabani, S., Allaz, J.M. and Stern, C.R., 2018b. Geology, mineralization, mineral chemistry, and ore-fluid conditions of Irankuh Pb-Zn mining district, south of Isfahan. Journal of Economic Geology, 9(2): 267–294. (in Persian with English abstract) Karimpour, M.H. and Sadeghi, M., 2018. Dehydration of hot oceanic slab at depth 30–50 km: KEY to formation of Irankuh-Emarat Pb-Zn MVT belt, Central Iran. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 194: 88–103. Leach, D.L. and Sangster, D., 1993. Mississippi Valley-type lead-zinc deposits. Geological Association of Canadian. Specific Paper, 40: 289–314. Leach, D.L, Taylor, R.D., Fey, D.L., Diehl, S.F. and Saltus, R.W., 2010. A Deposit Model for Mississippi Valley-Type Lead-Zinc Ores, Chapter A of Mineral Deposit Models for Resource Assessment. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–A., 64 pp. Liu, Y., Song, Y., Fard, M., Zhou, L., Hou, Z. and Kendricke, M.A., 2019. Pyrite Re-Os age constraints on the Irankuh Zn-Pb deposit, Iran, and regional implications. Ore Geology Reviews, 104: 148–159.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,090
Tête enseignante GPT0,387
Écart entre enseignants0,297 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Même sujetGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→Travaux en français237 207→