MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W294975352

Canadian Cinema in the Age of Globalization

2001· article· en· W294975352 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David L. Pike

Notice bibliographique

RevueCineaction! · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueCinema and Media Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMovie theaterThe ImaginaryMedia studiesDramaJuryOrder (exchange)HistorySociologyArt historyLawArtPolitical scienceLiteraturePsychologyPsychoanalysis
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I feel very uncomfortable about this stuff, because for so long I've gotten a certain energy from being outside that it's difficult for me to accept the fact that part of me has now been accepted into the system. But of course it completely has. The moment you make a film that as many people have gone to see as Exotica, or has been awarded by industry as Exotica, you've been absorbed by the system. So anyone who's defined themselves outside of it can't help but feel a bit uncomfortable. But that's happened, and I don't feel I've compromised anything in order to allow it to happen. --Atom Egoyan (1995) Nearly ten years ago, Kass Banning introduced a previous CineAction special issue on Canadian Cinema by announcing that In spite of the ascription that Canadian culture cannot exist--that it is indeed an impossibility--we are witnessing a surge, a 'new wave of filmmaking in this 'imaginary' nation. (1) If that wave can be said to have crested in Atom Egoyan's The Sweet Hereafter (1997) being feted at Cannes and nominated for two Academy Awards, and David Cronenberg's Crash (1996) gaining notoriety worldwide and a special jury prize at Cannes, the sure signs that it had come down, to be transformed into something else, were clear to see by 1999, which saw the release of Egoyan's, Cronenberg's and Patricia Rozema's deepest forays into echt commercial territory ever: the Ireland-set serial-killer drama, Felicia's Journey, the English heritage classic, Mansfield Park (part of a three-movie deal with Miramax), and the video-gaming science-fiction comedy, eXistenZ. While the first two were quasi-independent 'art' films, all three were produced, distributed and exhibited far more within a commercial Hollywood framework than outside of one. I will argue below that these three films do not necessarily represent either a sell-out or a repudiation of some essential 'Canadianness' in the filmmaking of any of these directors; for the moment I want simply to register the fact that they constitute a new direction, perhaps the most important feature of which is a different relationship to the multi-national film production world, a relationship evident even in Guy Maddin's most recent feature (and first in 35mm), Twilight of the Ice Nymphs (1997). None of the directors of this so-called 'New Wave' have lacked in critical coverage, but there has been little serious critical attention paid to outlining the characteristics of the movement as a whole, to studying the ways in which it may have been related to changing attitudes to Canadian culture in general, and to a fundamental transformation in the relation of these films to Hollywood-derived practices of production, storytelling and representation. Uniquely in the history of Canadian cinema, this New Wa ve was at least in part a commercial phenomenon, not just within Canada, but especially in the United States, Europe and elsewhere. (2) As Geoff Pevere noted around the same time as Banning, the New Wave, which he limited to Ontario, emerged Out of the ruins of the tax-shelter debacle created by the Capital Cost Allowance (CCA) authorizing a one-hundred percent tax writeoff between 1974 and 1984. (3) By channelling nearly all available funding into fly-by-night Hollywood-bound rubbish, the CCA made it extremely difficult for key figures in both Quebecois and English Canadian film of the '60s and early 70s to continue making films. Moreover, the ensuing mutual antipathy between aesthetic and commercial goals polarized a scholarly community already primed by the uncompromising dictates of post-structuralist theory, and a critical community radicalized by the injustice of the CCA and furious at its effects on a fledgling film culture. The result has been an enduring critical bias against any signs of departure from the documentary-based, local and explicitly politically engaged realism of the pre-tax-shelter years that has caused world-class di rectors such as Egoyan and Cronenberg to be recognized far sooner abroad than at home, and led to a reluctance even to look for common features among the ever more diverse output of Canadian filmmakers. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,077
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,560

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0230,009
Communication savante0,0130,004
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0540,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,194 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCineaction!Même sujetCinema and Media StudiesTravaux en français237 207