MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2950058778 · doi:10.1353/crc.2019.0016

The New Mutants: Superheroes and the Radical Imagination of American Comics by Ramzi Fawaz

2019· article· en· W2950058778 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anna F. Peppard

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian review of comparative literature · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueComics and Graphic Narratives
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComicsCountercultureLiteratureHEROArtPopular cultureArt historyAesthetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The New Mutants: Superheroes and the Radical Imagination of American Comics by Ramzi Fawaz Anna F. Peppard Fawaz, Ramzi. The New Mutants: Superheroes and the Radical Imagination of American Comics. New York: New York UP, 2016. Pp. 368. $89.00 US hardcover, $29.00 US paperback. The title of Ramzi Fawaz’s The New Mutants is reference to a 1965 essay in which literary critic Leslie Fiedler describes new forms of literature that envision “the transcendence or transformation of the human” into a race of “mutants.” Fiedler views this transformation as both fantastical and real; elsewhere in his essay, he claims the hegemony will recognize these mutants as members of the increasingly influential counterculture. The New Mutants is also, of course, the title of a long-running Marvel comic book, in which a group of superpowered teenagers are, as one old tagline put it, “feared and hated by the world they have sworn to protect.” This dual reference serves Fawaz well, as his book’s central topic is the interconnection of postwar super-hero comics with the same era’s history of liberal, progressive, and radical thought; in this, Fawaz interprets the mutant protagonists of postwar superhero comics as countercultural heroes who both reflect contemporary upheavals and imagine future changes even as they keep the world safe from the egomaniacal machinations of [End Page 192] Magneto and Dr. Doom. Across seven chronologically and thematically organized chapters, Fawaz charts what he describes as the evolution of the American superhero “from a nationalist champion to a figure of radical difference mapping the limits of American liberalism and its promise of universal inclusion in the post-World War II period” (3). Each chapter advances this thesis by analyzing a particular comic book series or group of series as a reflection of, and reaction to, certain sets of historically relevant themes. Chapter One reads early issues of The Justice League of America as evidence of an increased sense of international responsibility within 1950s American culture. Chapters Two and Three read early issues of The Fantastic Four in conversation with the Cold War, radiation fears, and the rise of second-wave feminism. Chapter Four reads space operas from the 1970s starring the likes of the Silver Surfer and the X-Men as reflections of a nostalgic longing for the previous decade’s promises of transformation. Chapter Five investigates the rise of “working class” consciousness in comics from the 1970s, and Chapter Six reads demonic possession stories in several different superhero comics from the 1980s as critiques of the “Me” decade’s “[s]elf-interest, overconsumption, and profligate investment in immediate pleasure” (200). Finally, Chapter Seven argues that the increasingly traumatic, intergenerational, and intersectional conflicts within The New Mutants series from the 1980s represent the end of an era, evincing the decline of the postwar fantasy of universal citizenship in favour of a newly fractured, but also newly multiple, view of American society and culture. In each chapter, Fawaz’s inventive analysis highlights the sophistication and complexity of popular texts that remain underexplored relative to contemporaneous films and television shows. More than this, Fawaz argues that superhero comics might be unique among popular texts in their ability to explore progressive themes and ideas. Throughout, Fawaz asserts that characters who are defined by their non-normative bodies and multiple identities, and who continually transform from one person (or thing) into another, are ideally suited to articulating anxieties and fantasies related to the changing nature of postwar American society, and the changing boundaries of human identity and potential in postwar American culture. Admittedly, the radical or subversive capacity of the superhero body is not a new concept, having already been identified by Scott Bukatman and Aaron Taylor, among others. Yet the creativity and passion of Fawaz’s analysis and the thematic and historical breadth of his examples makes an old argument newly convincing. Fawaz’s style is another boon. Throughout, Fawaz’s writing is infused with infectious energy; he knows these comics, but he also clearly loves them, and he embraces that love to propel his investigation into why so many people have found these stories so appealing for so many years. Unfortunately, however...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,895
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,990

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,234
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian review of comparative literatureMême sujetComics and Graphic NarrativesTravaux en français237 207