Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Asthma is a chronic condition that affects individuals of all ages and its prevalence is on the rise (Yen, Yelin, Katz, Eisner, & Blanc, 2006). The prevalence is highest in the United States and Canada (Lougheed. 2007). Poorly controlled asthma leads to decreased health and well-being and limitations in daily activities (Meyer, Sternfels, Fagan, & Ford, 2002). One of the goals of asthma treatment is to improve quality of life. The objective of this investigation was to assess the existence of a relationship between (a) quality of life with asthma and educational levels of individuals, (b) quality of life with asthma and number of clinic visits to an allergy/asthma specially clinic, and (c) level or education and the number or clinic visits by the patient. Asthma patients were identified by the physician. Data collection was obtained via the use or the Mini Asthma Quality or Lire Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ) developed by Professor Elizabeth Juniper (Juniper, Guyau, Ferric, & Griffith, 1993). Level of education or participants was assessed utilizing a brief questionnaire developed by the investigator. Spearman's rho is the statistical test that was utilized to determine if a relationship existed between asthma quality or life and educational levels or individuals, in addition to determining if a relationship existed between educational levels of individuals and number or clinic visits by the patient. Pearson's product-moment correlation was the statistical test utilized to determine if a relationship existed between number of clinic visits and asthma quality of life. / A convenience sample (N=50) was obtained from an allergy/asthma specialty clinic in north Texas from May 12 to July 11, 2008. Correlations were calculated using Spearman's rho and Pearson's product moment correlation. / Research question number one was, \What is the relationship, if any, between level of education in adult asthmatics and asthma quality of life?\ Level of level of education (skewness = -.946, kurtosis .300) and quality of life scores obtained from the completion of the Mini-AQLQ (M = 5.88, SD= .936) were correlated. r’s = .091, p = .530. / Research question number two was, \What is the relationship, if any, between number of clinic visits and quality of life in adults with asthma'?\ Number of clinic visits (skewness = .907, kurtosis, .128) and quality of life (M = 5.88, SD = .936) were correlated, r= -.028, p = .845. / Research question number three was, \What is the relationship, if any, between level of education and number of clinic visits in adults with asthma?\ Level of education (skewness = -.946, kurtosis .300) and number of clinic visits (M= 1.44, SD = .577) were correlated, r’s = .008, p = .954. / This investigation found that there were no statistically significant relationships between quality of life in adult asthmatics, level of education completed, or number of clinic visits at this investigational site.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».