MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2952002888 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2018.0014

Victorian Gender Fluidity: Performativity and Reception in A Florida Enchantment and Gabriel

2018· article· en· W2952002888 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kara Raphaeli

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMasculinityNewspaperPlot (graphics)Identity (music)EssentialismRepresentation (politics)ArtReading (process)Gender studiesSociologyLiteratureAestheticsMedia studiesPhilosophyLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Victorian Gender FluidityPerformativity and Reception in A Florida Enchantment and Gabriel Kara Raphaeli (bio) How do we read masculinity performed by someone assigned female at birth and presenting as female? How might a nineteenth-century audience have read such masculinity? Can an audience make the jump past not only physiological signifiers of gender such as breasts, long hair, and facial features but sartorial signifiers as well? Can an audience see a female actor in female costume and retain awareness of the character’s masculine identity through knowledge of the plot and performance of masculine physicality? Can these performances be understood as more than the lesbian-coded homoerotics scholars have previously attached to them? This analysis of Archibald Clavering Gunter’s A Florida Enchantment is partly an act of reconstitution. While what interests me most is the 1896 stage performance and its reception, the text has been lost. I therefore approach the performance through an analysis of the 1892 novel and the 1914 film version, as well as contemporaneous newspaper reviews. The film version mainly follows the plot of the novel, with the exception of an altered ending. Based on newspaper reviews, Laura Horak concludes that the play did not alter the ending, staying true to the novel, with the exception of the addition of a few musical numbers (97). I will explore Gunter’s 1892 novel and 1896 stage adaptation of A Florida Enchantment and George Sand’s 1839 play Gabriel, reading both as forms of trans representation. Both plays explore gender fixity, fluidity, and essentialism through representations of non-normative gender identity. Furthermore, both feature a central character played by a woman who performs both male and female personas. A Florida Enchantment is a melodrama that tells the story of Lilly Travers, a young New York heiress who ingests a magic seed that was stolen from an African tree and that turns her into a man. Wishing to live as a man, Travers leaves Florida to create a new male persona so that he1 may return as a man and court a woman with whom he has fallen in love. Gabriel’s titular character is assigned female at birth but raised as a boy in order to bypass inheritance laws (the play takes place in seventeenth-century Italy, where property and aristocratic title could be inherited only by men). Discovering his assigned sex at age seventeen, Gabriel seeks out his cousin, Astolphe, who is the rightful heir. The two cousins become lovers, and Gabriel proceeds to live a dual [End Page 131] life—presenting as Gabriel in society and as Astolphe’s wife, Gabrielle, during secret rendezvous in the country. The play explores notions of gender essentialism and critiques the misogynist confines of female gender norms through Gabriel’s navigating both male and female personas. In this essay, I will explore issues of gender presentation and gender identity within these two plays as well as how sexuality and desire function in conjunction with gender presentation. I will take time to examine A Florida Enchantment’s conflation of gender and racial hybridity and the minstrelsy tradition in which the play was performed. Finally, I will express some thoughts regarding a trans perspective of both plays. In A Florida Enchantment, we see Travers perform three separate genders. First, she performs the femininity expected by the ideology known as “the Victorian Cult of True Womanhood.”2 Next, Travers is turned into a man but continues presenting as Lilly, creating an interesting layering of genders on the stage. Finally, he takes on the presentation and identity of Lawrence, which corresponds to his new gender. Tracking these three gender performances provides a window into audience reception of the play as well as the gender beliefs to which Gunter reacts. When Lilly Travers is introduced in the novel version of A Florida Enchantment, her description is that of the Victorian ideal of womanhood. She is described as “graceful and feminine” in her appearance and her movements. She is timid in some respects, becoming frightened at the sight of a taxidermied rattlesnake. The text focuses a great deal on her emotions, particularly her passion and jealousy over her fiancé, Fred. Her jealousy is...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,983
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian reviewMême sujetShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismTravaux en français237 207