MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2952641897 · doi:10.7939/r3416tf1z

Evolution of the Western Newfoundland Appalachian Orogen and its Foreland Basin

2018· article· en· W2952641897 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shawna E. White

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésForeland basinGeologyStructural basinAppalachiaPaleontologyArchaeologyGeography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The northern Appalachian Orogen was built during multiple orogenic episodes resulting from Cambrian through Devonian accretion of microcontinents and/or crustal ribbons to the eastern margin of Laurentia. Orogenic loading formed a foreland basin on the Laurentian craton. Orogen-derived sediments were deposited into the basin on top of a Cambrian through Early Ordovician passive margin, formed prior to the closure of the Iapetus Ocean. This study combines geophysical interpretation, geologic mapping, and geochronology to study the geologic history of deformed Paleozoic rocks of Laurentian affinity and the Appalachian foreland basin in the western Newfoundland Appalachians. Interpreted seismic reflection profiles and offshore aeromagnetic maps enable recognition of structure of the foreland basin, largely hidden beneath the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Isochron maps of the Middle Ordovician Goose Tickle Group demonstrate eastward thickening, suggesting loading by the Newfoundland segment of the orogen. A fast subsidence rate of ~ 0.17 km/Myr implies deposition in a pro-arc basin, formed on the eastward subducting Laurentian plate. Major fault-scarp units within the Goose Tickle Group indicate subsidence was controlled by large faults, in addition to distributed flexure resulting from orogenic loading and slab pull. Tectonic models indicate that subduction reversed polarity from east to west-dipping by the Late Ordovician, implying the Upper Ordovician Long Point Group was deposited in a retro-arc basin, on the upper plate. However, a fast subsidence rate of 0.17 km/Myr is consistent with deposition in a pro-arc basin. Isochron maps also demonstrate southward thickening of the Long Point Group, suggesting the basin was generated by loading from the Québec segment of the orogen. These observations indicate subduction polarity reversal was delayed in the Québec embayment, placing the Upper Ordovician basin in a hybrid retro/pro-arc setting. The hybrid setting, resulting from the irregular margin shape, is analogous to the modern plate boundary configuration along the northern Australian Plate. The record of Silurian activity is largely removed in the foreland basin at the latest Silurian Clam Bank unconformity which likely records uplift and erosion associated with slab break-off of the west-dipping subducting slab during the trailing end of (~ 440 â 420 Ma) Salinian orogenesis. Early Devonian (~ 420 â 400 Ma) Acadian orogenesis resulted in deposition of the latest Silurian to Early Devonian Clam Bank-Red Island Road succession. New mapping, aeromagnetic, and seismic interpretation at Parsons Pond allow recognition of structure in poorly exposed areas. The Humber Arm Allochthon contains a series of stacked and folded duplexes, typical of thrust belts. To the east, the Parsons Pond thrust transported basement, shelf and foreland-basin units westward above the allochthon. The Long Range thrust, farther east, shows less offset. Stratigraphic relationships indicate that basement-involved thrusts originated as normal faults, active during Neoproterozoic rifting and Taconian flexure. Devonian (Acadian) continental collision inverted the Parsons Pond and Long Range thrusts generating basement-cored fault-propagation folds, structurally analogous to uplifts of the Laramide Orogen in western USA. Similar deep-seated inversion structures may extend through the northern Appalachians, explaining enigmatic map patterns in New England. U-Pb ages of detrital zircon within the foreland basin are consistent with derivation from Laurentian sources. The Goose Tickle Group has abundant Mesoproterozoic and Archean grains. Paleoproterozoic ages are predominantly 1.85 Ga, indicating derivation from units within the Humber Arm Allochthon, which contain abundant zircons at 1.85 Ga. An abundance of Mesoproterozoic grains and conspicuous lack of 1.85 Ga zircons in the Long Point Group indicates a major provenance shift, whereby sediments were not derived from the Humber Arm Allochthon. Probability density plots of continental margin units in the Québec/New England segment of the orogen demonstrate a similar strong Mesoproterozoic and weak Paleoproterozoic signature, suggesting derivation of the Long Point Group from the Québec segment of the orogen. Similar provenance shifts in other foreland basins, formed at promontory to embayment transitions, may indicate a similar delay in subduction polarity reversal at the embayment. The absence of 2.0 â 2.2 Ga and 550 â 650 Ma Gondwanan zircons, and abundant 1.0 Ga grains within the Clam Bank-Red Island Road succession, is consistent with underthrusting of Ganderia and Avalonia during Salinian and Acadian orogenesis. Only Mesoproterozoic zircons were found in the Early Devonian Red Island Road Formation, consistent with derivation from Mesoproterozoic Grenville massifs uplifted during Devonian Acadian inversion.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,183
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,367

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,143
Écart entre enseignants0,137 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta Library→Même sujetGeological and Geochemical Analysis→Travaux en français237 207→