Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT.Sexual activity, like any other human activities, is multiple and diversified, including people who can not imagine sex but within its reproductive dimension as part of a marriage and people who embrace libertinage as a way of living. Some people prefer partners of the same sex, others can not find pleasure but with the opposite sex. Sex and love are not to be dissociated for some people, others turn sexuality into a gainful activity. A just settlement of the activity should bracket the different meanings each individual assigns to his erotic life. Thus, law reduces its intervention to two principles: individuals' consent and lack of damages for the partner.Keywords: sexuality, orientation, identity, discriminationSexual emancipation and pandemic AIDS expansion in the second half of the 20th century have placed sexuality in the heart of the political and social debate. Settled in the sphere of intimacy and private life, sexuality bursts into public space, firstly due to the political action of the feminism, then through the requisitions of the L.G.B.T. movement (lesbians, gay, bisexual, transsexual). Meanwhile, sexuality is the most difficult human activity, to free from the traditional morality and the medical speech, which often occludes a judicial analysis. A theory of the sexuality right would find its foundation in a laic, consented philosophy starting with the idea of the autonomous and responsible subject's will, who expresses his/her freedom by making reasonably choices.Sexual activity, like any other human activities, is multiple and diversified, including people who can not imagine sex but within its reproductive dimension as part of a marriage and people who embrace libertinage as a way of living. Some people prefer partners of the same sex, others can not find pleasure but with the opposite sex. Sex and love are not to be dissociated for some people, others turn sexuality into a gainful activity. A just settlement of the activity should bracket the different meanings each individual assigns to his erotic life. Thus, law reduces its intervention to two principles: individuals' consent and lack of damages for the partner.1Starting with a discretional reading of sexuality (meaning emancipated from traditions, doctrine or ideologies) and a modest concept of the law, this study is divided in three: the first part introduces the political and philosophical principles which stipulate life: the evolution of the foundation of the prohibitions, the margin of appreciating a status, law's intervention to limit individual will, the tension between freedom, equality and human dignity; the second part analyses aspects related to freedom, equality (man-woman) and sexualities (homosexuality-heterosexuality) and criminal offences; the third part includes and analyses precise examples of sexuality (prostitution, pornography, pedophilia, harassment) based on classic summa division: consented sexuality - borne (forced) sexuality. A specific study of the main international conventions referring to and reproductive rights, the right to asylum of the minorities and the fight against tourism is carried out.1. orientationSexual is the affective and desire, the erotic appeal for people of the same sex (sexual homosexual orientation), or indistinguishably, for the same or the opposite sex (sexual bisexual orientation). Sexual orientation phrase firstly appeared in 1972 in a legal stipulation in Michigan, then in a couple of laws in the district of Columbia and Washington in U.S.A., in order to sanction the discriminations regarding homosexuals. The charter of the human being's rights from Quebec, in 1977 was the first constitutional stipulation to establish a specific protection against discriminations regarding orientation. For the European level, article 13 in Amsterdam Treaty places the phrase sexual orientation in a stipulation which obliges U. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».