Interpreting air mass and precipitation structures from a weather-climate interface perspective: Analyses and projections
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Future Arctic air masses are likely to be altered by Arctic amplification of tropospheric warming and the declining sea ice exposing large regions of open water. These changes are expected to alter mass fields across the Northern Hemisphere and be accompanied by changes climatological storm tracks and precipitation distributions. In order to quantify future changes in precipitation, we must first understand how well precipitation variability is captured both in observations and in global climate models (GCM). An experiment is conducted to quantify the representativeness errors, the errors incurred while upscaling station precipitation measurements to a gridded product that can be employed for GCM validation. Error ranges for both median and extreme precipitation are computed by repeatedly gridding station data with subsequently fewer stations for regions in the United States. The representation of the full distribution of precipitation intensity in the Community Climate System Model (CCSM4) over the contiguous United States and southern Canada, is investigated through comparison to several observational and reanalysis reference datasets. The skewness in the precipitation intensity distributions, relative to the reference datasets, varies regionally. In particular, we found a systematic bias toward lighter precipitation occurring in the Great Plains and eastern United States in the model. The bias is towards heavier precipitation however over the Rocky Mountains and the western United States. We find that model errors in extreme precipitation are approaching the magnitude of the disparity between the reference products, likely both a reflection of both strong model performance and the existence of significant bias in some commonly used reference products.To investigate how Arctic air masses will change across the 21st century, we employ the Community Earth System model large ensemble to explore how patterns in January-February equivalent potential temperature at 850hPa (θe850) will change. To separate change in the mean from internal variability, the large number of ensemble members is leveraged to create an anomaly θe850 field computed as the daily θe850 values minus the yearly January-February ensemble average. A technique of self-organizing maps is applied to the daily equivalent potential temperatures anomalies at 850hPa, producing a set of archetypes of air mass patterns across the 21st century. The frequency of occurrence of each archetype changes through the period of study, where most notably there is a statistically significant decline in a pattern with low θe850 over the central Arctic. This pattern, when compared with a decadal average, has a more zonal circulation at 500hPa and higher sea ice concentrations over the peripheral Arctic seas. There is also a significant increase in the frequency of patterns with both higher and lower θe850 over North America, associated with an enhanced meridional circulation at 500hPa. These changes in the internal variability of air masses and of the general circulation will likely alter the climatological distribution of precipitation amongst other impactful atmospheric phenomena.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».