Phase I/II Study of Infusional Gemcitabine and High-Dose Melphalan Conditioning Prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma: Interim Safety Analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction The optimal re-induction and high dose chemotherapy regimens for transplant-eligible patients with relapsed lymphoma are not known. Our centre has previously established the efficacy and tolerability of single-agent high-dose melphalan and ASCT in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin9s lymphoma (HL), and others have similarly demonstrated this with non-Hodgkin9s lymphoma (NHL). The activity of alkylating agents such as melphalan is dependent on the extent of DNA damage, and combining melphalan with drugs known to inhibit DNA damage repair would be predicted to produce synergistic effects. Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analogue that has been shown to inhibit DNA damage repair caused by prior exposure to alkylating agents, and has clinical anti-tumour activity against lymphoma, and therefore presents a promising combination with alkylators in high-dose chemotherapy studies for lymphoma. Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of infusional gemcitabine prior to high-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma. The data reported currently reflects a planned interim safety analysis after the first 40 patients enrolled on the study. Methods This is an investigator-initiated single centre study currently enrolling patients as of April 2015. Adult patients with relapsed or refractory HL, aggressive NHL, or indolent NHL after at least one prior systemic therapy are eligible for this study. Inclusion/exclusion criteria included ECOG performance status ≤2, no significant end-organ dysfunction, no prior history of stem cell transplantation, no CNS involvement, and chemo-sensitive disease (at least partial remission to salvage chemotherapy) at the time of transplantation. High dose therapy regimen was as follows: On Day -1, IV gemcitabine was administered as a loading bolus of 75 mg/m2, followed by a continuous infusion rate of 10 mg/m2/min, followed immediately by IV melphalan 200 mg/m2. In the phase I portion of the study, the starting dose of gemcitabine was 1.5 g/m2 in the first cohort, with dose escalation based on standard 3+3 design, increasing by 0.5 g/m2 increments at each dose level to maximum of 2.5 g/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade 3 mucositis >5 days, grade 3 skin toxicity >3 days, grade 3 diarrhea >7 days, or any grade 4 non-hematological toxicity. Results The mean age of the study population was 52 (SD +/-14) with equal numbers of male and female patients. 12 (30%) patients had aggressive NHL (6 DLBCL, 1 PMBCL, 3 ALCL, 2 PTCL), 17 (42.5%) had indolent NHL (15 follicular, 1 lymphoplasmacytic, 1 marginal zone lymphoma), and 11 (27.5%) had HL. At time of relapse, 30% (12/40) of patients had refractory disease after first line therapy, 70% (28/40) had stage III/IV disease, and 6 patients (16%) had >1 prior line of systemic chemotherapy. The median time from relapse to transplant was 90 days (range 12 to 189 days). There were no dose limiting toxicities at 1.5 g/m2 dose of gemcitabine. 8 patients received 2.0 g/m2 and dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea >7 days) was noted in 2 patients, thus the remaining patients received 1.5 g/m2 gemcitabine. 18 patients experienced 24 grade 3-4 adverse non-hematological events: mucositis (7), infectious enterocolitis (5), pneumonia (4), sepsis (2), non-infectious diarrhea (1), esophagitis (1), emesis (1), transaminitis (1), pulmonary edema (1), and stroke (1). There were no treatment-related deaths associated with this regimen. Post-transplant complete remission and partial remission was attained in 25/40 and 9/40 patients, respectively. 6/40 (15%) patients have progressed after transplant, and 2 have died of lymphoma. At a median follow-up of 10 months (range 2-26 months), the progression-free survival is 59.3% and overall survival is 93.8% (Figure 1). Conclusion Infusional gemcitabine at a maximum tolerated dose of 1.5 g/m2 in combination with high dose melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation is tolerable and appears to be efficacious in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma. Disclosures Stewart: BMS: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».