MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2953661860 · doi:10.7939/r3mp4w41w

Exploring Oral Self-Care Practices and Concerns of Community-Dwelling Individuals Living with Dementia and Their Care Partners

2018· article· en· W2953661860 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nadia Kobagi

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDementiaAssisted livingSelf careGerontologyPsychologyMedicineHealth carePolitical scienceDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dementia is a progressive disorder that affects thinking and memory. One of the most significant day-to-day impacts of dementia is the loss in ability to complete basic activities of daily living (ADLs), such as oral care. Toothbrushing is a multi-step task that individuals living with dementia often experience difficulty completing independently due to forgetting the need or even how to brush their teeth and/or dentures. The objective of this study was to explore the practices and concerns around oral self-care from the perspective of community-dwelling individuals living with dementia (ILDs) and their care partners (CPs). A qualitative exploratory design was employed using focus group (FG) sessions. Partnership with the Alzheimer Society of Alberta & Northwest Territories (ASANT) facilitated the recruitment of CP and ILD participants. Twenty CP participants participated in one of three FGs (N=7; 7; 6); seventeen CP participants identified themselves as an ILD’s spouse and three as a child of an ILD. These participants were primary care partners to people living with various ASANT-specific classifications of dementia including early-stage, young-onset, and respite. Nine ILD participants were also recruited, all of which had CPs participating in the FG sessions. Early-stage and young-onset ILD participants took part in one of two FGs (N=6; 3). The FG sessions were conducted separately but simultaneously; one group consisting of CP participants, and one group of ILD participants. FGs were guided by a series of semi-structured questions that were asked verbally and provided in-text for reference. Oral care props were used in ILD focus groups as triggers to allow for deeper and more dental-oriented discussions. FG sessions lasted 90-minutes and were audio and video recorded to complement recall. Data were transcribed by a professional; transcripts were reviewed and enhanced with descriptive and nonverbal details obtained from video recordings by the research team. Content analysis of transcript data consisted of open coding, categorization, and abstraction. Two co-supervisors also coded each transcript and discussion resolved any differences in interpretations. While ILD participants were categorized using clinical diagnostic criteria, there was little correspondence between their reported level of independence and the oral care practices they discussed. CP participants strove to contextualize oral care as one dimension of preserving autonomy and humaneness of their loved one. Oral care practices reflected a continuum of independence ranging from wholly or partially independent to wholly dependent. All ILD participants reported being wholly independent in oral care and stressed the maintenance of their remaining capacities until the time when tasks would be delegated for them. Strategies used to ensure oral care included relying on embodied habits (e.g. toothbrushing), providing supportive aids (e.g. setting out toothbrush), verbal reminders, and physical interventions. Difficulties were encountered when an ILD resisted support because of their claim of independence or when an ILD stressed the simplicity these engrained habits as these behaviours were instilled at a young age. CP and ILD participants were cognizant that strategies to promote oral care had to change over time, although some CPs realized during the FG sessions, their current practices were insufficient to meet the needs of their loved ones. CP participants struggled to identify key transition points that indicated a different level of assistance was required as oral care was assumed to be an embodied and persistent habit. CPs need support in accurately determining an ILD’s actual abilities, as well as, strategies to gain cooperation as CPs enter into a more assistive role. Implications of this study include the need for anticipatory guidance in discussing and educating CPs around behavioural indicators to watch for as the ILD progresses through the various levels of independence. In addition, this study will allow for better cognitive assessments to take place in dental clinics by asking direct questions that probe into contextual information that may indicate the ILDs capacity for oral self-care has deteriorated, for example asking whether or not the level of toothpaste and/or floss has changed? Dental hygienists are well-situated to provide appropriate interventions and homecare strategies, which could decrease disjunction between what CPs think, what ILDs report, and what oral self-care practices actually take place. Dental hygienists contribute to maintaining adequate oral health for ILDs, that could, in turn, improve their quality of life in the community.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,041

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,003
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,065
Tête enseignante GPT0,288
Écart entre enseignants0,223 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTravaux en français237 207