MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2955572659 · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30102-1

Caribbean public health: achievements and future challenges

2019· letter· en· W2955572659 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. James Hospedales

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet Public Health · 2019
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPublic healthEconomic growthPolitical scienceLatin AmericansPopulationCaribbean regionGeographyMedicineLibrary scienceEnvironmental healthNursing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Caribbean Public Health Agency (CARPHA), one of the three multinational public health agencies in the world, commenced operations on Jan 1, 2013, with the aim of delivering the functions of five previous regional health institutions (Caribbean Epidemiology Centre, Caribbean Environmental Health Institute, Caribbean Food and Nutrition Institute, Caribbean Health Research Council, and Caribbean Regional Drug Testing Laboratory) through one platform for greater synergy and cost-effectiveness and as the principal institutional expression of Caribbean Cooperation in Health.1Carrillo Roa A Santana JP Regional integration and south-south cooperation in health in Latin America and the Caribbean.Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012; 32: 368-375Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar CARPHA provides public health surveillance, emergency response, laboratory, information, research, training, and policy development services that benefit a diverse population of 17 million people in 24 English, French, and Dutch-speaking member states and territories. The region also received 57 million visitors in 2018, mostly from North America, the UK, and Europe. CARPHA has had several key achievements. First, it coordinated regional health security in response to Chikungunya and Zika, including intensified surveillance and vector control, scaling up of testing through the Caribbean Public Health Laboratory Network, and public education.2Olowokure B Francis L Polson-Edwards K et al.The Caribbean response to chikungunya.Lancet Infect Dis. 2014; 14: 1039-1040Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar, 3Zika virus outbreak in 19 English- and Dutch-speaking Caribbean countries and territories, 2015–2016.Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018; 42: e120PubMed Google Scholar Second, CARPHA involvement in research has included hosting the Annual Caribbean Health Research Conference (the longest-running health conference in Latin America and the Caribbean), building research capacity through training, establishment of a network of research ethics committee chairs, and a register of human trials. It also continues to advocate for legislation governing research on humans. Third, CARPHA has introduced new value-added services, such as the Field Epidemiology and Training Programme and the Tourism and Health Programme, aimed at improving health monitoring, food safety, and environmental management, which it did in partnership with the Caribbean hotel and tourism industry. It also launched the C3aribbean Regulatory System for pharmaceuticals, in partnership with the Pan American Health Organization and WHO.4Preston C Chahal HS Porrás A et al.Regionalization as an approach to regulatory systems strengthening: a case study in CARICOM member states.Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016; 39: 262-268PubMed Google Scholar Finally, CARPHA has shown leadership and innovated by, for example, raising awareness of child obesity prevention related to the economic sector with a six-point policy package for healthier food environments.5Kirton J Knight WA Hospedales CJ Hippolyte D Kulik K Regional and global impacts of the 2007 Port-of-Spain Declaration on noncommunicable diseases.Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018; 42: e194PubMed Google Scholar It has raised awareness of climate change as a major regional public health threat to small island developing states. In June, 2018, CARPHA launched the International Agency for Research on Cancer Caribbean Cancer Registry Hub for its member states. The Caribbean has made many gains in health, but it has an unsustainable burden of chronic non-communicable diseases and injuries, an ageing population, unprecedented disease, environmental, and climate challenges, and is not on track to meet the Sustainable Development Goals. However, cost-effective solutions exist, such as the WHO's Best Buys for non-communicable diseases6Allen LN Pullar J Wickramasinghe KK et al.Evaluation of research on interventions aligned to WHO ‘Best Buys’ for NCDs in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review from 1990 to 2015.BMJ Glob Health. 2018; 3e000535 Crossref PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar or the shared services that CARPHA provides in regional public health lab services, which require everyone to work together. In that regard, CARPHA is in a unique position to lead and encourage change in countries and political processes, regional institutions, academia, civil society, the private sector, and international partners, such as the Pan American Health Organization and WHO, which it can achieve in part by leveraging digital health and other technologies. With half of CARPHA's funding coming from member states and half from partners, it is a practical example of South-South-North cooperation. The EU, the USA, the UK, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Latin American countries have particularly intertwined interests in the Caribbean. Other regional and international partners are invited to join this noble mission to make a difference to health and development within the Caribbean. I declare no competing interests. The Caribbean response to chikungunyaAs of Oct 6, 2014, the Caribbean Public Health Agency (CARPHA) has reported 7981 confirmed cases of chikungunya since December, 2013, when the first cases were reported from the French Caribbean island of Saint Martin.1 These are the first occurrences of autochthonously transmitted chikungunya to be identified in the region. As with several other viruses that have spread as a result of human behaviour and globalisation, local spread was probably originated in a traveller returning from an affected area overseas. Full-Text PDF

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,012
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,089
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0120,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,182
Tête enseignante GPT0,331
Écart entre enseignants0,149 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Lancet Public HealthMême sujetGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyTravaux en français237 207