Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis aims to advance our understanding of corporate taxes and their effects on firm behaviour, particularly with regard to tax avoidance and investment, as well as how countries fight tax evasion and avoidance. Each chapter provides a distinct contribution to the corporation tax literature. The first two chapters analyze the corporate tax payments of companies residing in the United Kingdom using confidential corporate tax returns data. Chapter 1 focuses on comparisons between various company-ownership types, distinguishing in particular between multinational and domestic companies. I find that multinational companies, in spite of constituting only 3 percent of the population of UK companies, pay the majority of UK corporation tax, around 55 percent on average, during the period 2000 - 2011. However, multinational companies pay a very small amount of tax relative to their size, in comparison to domestic companies, and the share of UK corporation tax paid by multinational companies has declined over the period. Chapter 2 shows that there are systematic differences in how much taxable profits multinational and domestic companies report. Specifically, using comparable samples selected by propensity score matching, I estimate that UK subsidiaries of foreign multinationals report a 50 percent lower ratio of taxable profits to total assets than comparable domestic standalones. This difference is almost entirely attributable to the fact that a higher proportion of foreign multinational subsidiaries report zero taxable profits (59.2 percent) than domestic standalones (27.5 percent). A high share of foreign multinational subsidiaries are found to report zero taxable profits persistently over time, and high leverage is found to play an important role in producing this outcome. This suggests a very aggressive form of profit shifting for many of these foreign multinational companies. Chapter 3 investigates how investment responds to tax incentives. In particular, using the announcement and subsequent implementation of an exogenous tax reform in Canada as a quasi-natural experiment, I consider the effect of a temporary and unexpected increase in the cost of capital for a group of firms (income trusts) which had (for tax reasons) limited availability of retained earnings as a source of finance for investment. I show that these firms did not respond to the cost of capital increase during the period when they had limited availability of retained earnings. In turn, a subsequent increase in the availability of internal finance, prompted by the implementation of the tax reform in 2011, is shown to increase their investment substantially. These findings suggest that financing constraints on investment may have been binding for these firms. Chapter 4 discusses the exchange of tax information between tax havens and OECD countries. Together with Clemens Fuest, we analyze how tax havens have chosen their partner countries to sign tax information exchange agreements (TIEAs) with and hence comply with OECD standards. We find that tax havens have on average signed more TIEAs with countries to which they have stronger economic links. However, this does not mean that they exchange tax information with all important partner countries.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».