Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Novel Therapeutic Interventions-Present and Future
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a rare and fatal disease characterized by elevated mean pulmonary arterial pressure, dyspnea initially while exercising, fatigue, dizziness or fainting, chest pressure or pain, edema of the ankles and legs, ascites, cyanosis, and increased heart rate. If left untreated, it results in right heart ventricular failure and ultimately death. Current treatment of PH is pulmonary hypertension targeted drugs. Long-term survival of patients with PH is still suboptimal. This thematic issue addresses the new developments in the pathogenesis of PH and novel treatment modalities. The following are the highlights of this thematic issue. Prasad, K., discusses the incidence of various types of PH and its pathology. His main focus is on the role of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), its cell-bound receptor (RAGE), and soluble RAGE (sRAGE) in the pathogenesis of PH. The mechanisms of AGE-RAGE–induced PH have been discussed in detail. He has coined the term AGE-RAGE stress which, if high, produces PH. Based on the available data, he has suggested that reduction in consumption and formation of AGE, suppression of RAGE expression, blockage of RAGE ligand binding, elevation of sRAGE levels, and antioxidants may be novel therapeutic targets for prevention, regression, and slowing of the progression of PH. Ishak Gabra, N.B., et al, in this review deals with the definition, diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) including most recent advances and future directions. Etiology and classification of PAH have been described. Management of PAH with medications targeted at specific pathway of pathogenesis of PAH has been discussed. The treatment strategies are paired with lifestyle changes and tailored to average metrics that are used to prognosticate and measure the severity of patients with PAH. Combination therapy with separate signaling pathway affecting pathology of PAH is rapidly growing. This type of treatment has additive effects with low toxicity. Currently there is a search for treating PAH through targeting various vasoactive peptides, inhibition of cell proliferation, induction of apoptosis, and mitochondrial modulation of angiogenesis. Booth, D., has shown that there is a current shift in the combination therapy of pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH). Monotherapy includes phosphodiastrase-5 inhibitors, endothelin receptor antagonists, and prostanoids. Despite promising improvement in the hemodynamics, monotherapy has limited and unsatisfactory clinical benefits, and long-term poor prognosis. He has discussed numerous clinical trials of combination therapy. Combination therapy has a better outcome compared with monotherapy because of possible additive and synergic effects in a combination therapy. The data suggests that there is a progressive shift in the study design using longer event driven trials comparing the upfront and sequential combination therapy on clinical worsening outcome. Combination therapy significantly reduced the risk of clinical worsening compared with monotherapy. Tak, T., et al, have described in detail the pathophysiology and diagnostic measures of pulmonary embolism-induced pulmonary hypertension. Using patient presentation, clinical suspicion and various scoring systems, a definite diagnosis may be made and appropriate treatment can be instituted. Pulmonary embolism rule out criteria have been pointed out. Treatment such as oxygenation, stabilization of patients, anticoagulant, thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy and circulatory mechanical support have been discussed. Future direction in the management of pulmonary embolism has also been addressed. Tyagi, S. and Batra, V., focus on the drugs that reduce the vascular tone. They specially stress the NO-sGC-cGMP related agonists, PDEs inhibitors, prostacyclin analogues, and endothelin receptor antagonists for the treatment of PH. They also stress on the genetics, antioxidants, immunosuppressants, and stem cells for the treatment of PH. We are grateful to all the authors for their contribution of excellent papers in this thematic issue. We thank the reviewers for their comments and valuable suggestions. We deeply appreciate the support of Denise M. Rossignol, Executive Director, International College of Angiology, and Managing Editor, International Journal of Angiology, in completing this work.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».