Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This collection of posters and essays documents some of the results of an one-day poster session and workshop for early career researchers dealing with young readers in Europe, held within the framework of the international conference “Texts, Forms, Readings in Europe – 18th to 21st Centuries” (Le Mans, France, May 2013). Taking into account the strong link between texts, forms and readings as well as the fact that reading has not remained immutable over the past centuries, the interdisciplinary conference studied elements of continuity and disruption that are characteristic of the uses of texts and of reading practices in 18th-centruy to 21st-century Europe.Reading per se is indeed a cultural and social phenomenon and an inner process that changes from one society, one individual reader to another. Its history and its various modes have been explored in the last decades by scholars in Book studies and literary theory. Yet, despite the now established principle that the materiality of the book affects readers’ response, a study of the role and effects of the book as an object on children’s, teenagers’ and young adults’ reading practices, is largely overdue. Peter Hunt significant and pioneer contributions, as well as Sophie Van der Linden’s work on albums, have shown that the materiality of reading helps young readers to grasp the text and images, understand the story and become independent readers who think by themselves. But due to the plurality of approaches and interests that books for children entail, a lot remains to be done to reach a better understanding of children’s reading practices and this publication is only a small contribution to the broad project.While poster sessions belong to the standard format of conferences in engineering, natural sciences, etc., they are still relatively new ground for the humanities. Nonetheless, we invited early career researchers (MA candidates, PhD students and post-doc) from around Europe to participate in our moderated poster session and were delighted by the wealth of submissions. The poster session offered guests from the academy as well as practitioners from libraries, schools, and literacy institutions input on young readers in Europe in historical and current perspectives, presented by 14 scholars from four different countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy) in French and English. One of the clear advantages of posters is that they present images and text in an integrated form, much like children’s literature does; they are also more “durable” than an oral presentation, for they can be studied throughout the entire conference, much like an art exhibit. The poster session was rounded off by Dr. Alison Waller’s (UK) keynote speech, which presented results from her research on adults re-reading favorite children’s books, underlining the magic that is commonly associated with childhood reading experiences. Waller’s keynote speech formed an insightful and thought-provoking coda to the day’s posters, proving once again that the history of reading (and re-reading) children’s literature is a bountiful field of research.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,058 | 0,015 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».