Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Since its birth in the beginning of the twentieth century, jazz music has had an immense impact on the world. As jazz began to grow, many sub-genres developed within jazz, incorporating elements of blues, funk, rock, free music, and complex harmony. As a jazz musician myself, something always fascinates me is the diversity within the genre. With the development of steaming platforms such as Spotify, it has never been easier to discover the immense amount of jazz that musicians have gifted to this world. The popularity of jazz music has been in steady decline since the 1960s. This has resulted in many of the lesser-known jazz musicians to go unrecognized by the public as a “jazz greats,” unlike names everyone knows, such as Miles Davis, Duke Ellington, and John Coltrane. The Canadian born trumpet and flugelhorn player Kenny Wheeler has always stood out to me as an incredibly versatile and original composer, who has stretched the boundaries of jazz music. Wheeler has had an enormous impact on my musical studies–pushing me to compose more than I have ever before, and making me question the limits of jazz composition, like he did in his career. Studying Wheeler’s life and composing is a vehicle for me to work on my own composing and musicianship. Thorough analysis of Wheeler’s music has led me to many ideas that I transfer into my own music, and has given me context into what Wheeler was possibly thinking when he sat down to write his inventive music. As the last portion of this project, I have prepared a performance of five original Kenny Wheeler songs for jazz ensembles of varying size, from trio to septet. I personally transcribed and arranged all of the music for the concert and presentation on Kenny Wheeler. Doing this allowed me to get inside the mind of the great composer, and get a deeper look at the possible inspiration for his writing style. For one of my arrangements, I decided to broaden my own arranging skills by creating a sound that was unlike what Wheeler composed, while still using his melodic and harmonic ideas as scaffolding. This was no simple task, because Wheeler’s music is already so individual to him and him only; it is a great challenge to arrange his music to sound different than the iconic recordings he released decades ago.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».